dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
48
ihatedslr
join:2000-12-11
US

ihatedslr to ScottMo

Member

to ScottMo

Re: And they'll be the first......

makes sense to put the coverage where the people are.
bdon78
I didn't do it
join:2009-05-18
Decatur, GA

bdon78

Member

Agreed...seems obvious right?

thegeek
Premium Member
join:2008-02-21
right here

thegeek to ihatedslr

Premium Member

to ihatedslr
but that 97% is only 2G and they are talking about how they have the fastest 3G network throughout the entire commericals. you have to pause it and read the fine print to see that the 97% is only 2G. thats just as bad a misrepresentation.

morbo
Complete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000

morbo

Member

Let me tell you that those ads worked for the average joe. I explained to them why Verizon having 3x the 3g coverage that AT&T has is a different claim that what AT&T was saying in their rebuttal commercials.

ScottMo
Once in a Lifetime
MVM
join:2000-12-15
New York, NY

ScottMo to ihatedslr

MVM

to ihatedslr
I agree it makes sense for AT&T (few providers want to cover very small towns, deserts, and forests), but you have to be careful when reading. 97% of Americans doesn't mean it covers 97% of the country.



In looking at the map, it looks like 80% of America is actually covered (maybe 85% of the Continuous 48).

I'm just urging my children to be careful around advertising especially the wording they choose.
hottboiinnc4
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

hottboiinnc4

Member

that map has been around for YEARS they never up date that thing and a good share of that map is still probably EDGE.

SimbaSeven
I Void Warranties
join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT
·StarLink

SimbaSeven to ScottMo

Member

to ScottMo
Click for full size
The real at&t 3G map (sorry about the quick Cut and Paste)
cahiatt
Premium Member
join:2001-03-21
Smyrna, GA

1 recommendation

cahiatt to morbo

Premium Member

to morbo

Re: ATT worried about label accuracy?

Hey ATT! If you are worried about marketing and label accuracy, how about pricing your $19.95 phone service at a real $19.95 plus REQUIRED taxes. Stop with the underhanded bullshit fees.

RRedline
Rated R
Premium Member
join:2002-05-15
USA

RRedline to ScottMo

Premium Member

to ScottMo

Re: And they'll be the first......

The point is that Verizon was specifically referring to AT&T's much smaller 3G footprint, and AT&T responded with intentionally misleading advertising about covering 97% of Americans. Yeah, but not covering 97% with 3G! They went from bragging about being able to surf the web while talking on the phone (something that hardly anyone needs or wants to do), to the 97% figure. That was shady advertising, and they knew it.

AT&T spent millions responding with misleading advertising. Those millions could have been spent expanding their 3G footprint.

jap
Premium Member
join:2003-08-10
038xx

1 edit

jap to bdon78

Premium Member

to bdon78
Equally obvious that people don't stand in one place, they tend to be mobile. Which is why they have mobile phones. And they want to know which 3% of America they should avoid. Or seek, as the case may be.