dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
2876
share rss forum feed

Riplin

join:2002-05-13
canada

Hurt what?

?

SixSpeed

join:2001-12-24
USA
How do they know who "down loaded" it? Unless they hosted it themselves for distribution, I'm not sure they can catch the D/L'ers, just the hosters.

Hurt Locker failed because nobody wanted to see it, not because of piracy. Plenty of movies still break records in the "piracy" age.


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:42
reply to Riplin
The movie that won best picture at the Oscars?


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
said by Karl Bode:

The movie that won best picture at the Oscars?
The Oscars?
--
"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.


woody7
Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA
reply to Karl Bode
box office results

»boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hur ··· cker.htm

made back what it cost to produce
--
BlooMe


RARPSL

join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
reply to SixSpeed
said by SixSpeed:

How do they know who "down loaded" it? Unless they hosted it themselves for distribution, I'm not sure they can catch the D/L'ers, just the hosters.
Since this is BitTorrent we are talking about, EVERYONE who is downloading it is also hosting those parts ("pieces") of the file that they have already downloaded. Only once you have finished downloading the full file do you go into full Hosting (AKA Seeding) Mode.

As to how they can know who is downloading it, all that is needed is to connect to the BT Server and get a list of who is currently downloading and/or seeding it (ie: The Peers). By connecting to peers, you can get a list of what parts they already have. Requesting and receiving these pieces, you know that they are "hosting". Doing this with each peer (without sending back any pieces) you get your list.

Note: I am not saying that this is the actual method being used but only a theoretical way that it can be done.


PlanktonGosh

@verizon.net
reply to woody7
It didn't make back what it cost to produce. A movie has to gross approximately twice its production + advertising budget to break even. Whatever the film's merits, it is not yet profitable. Perhaps this legal blackmail will push HURT LOCKER into the black.


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:42

3 recommendations

reply to pnh102
said by pnh102:

said by Karl Bode:

The movie that won best picture at the Oscars?
The Oscars?
You know, the muppet that lives in a garbage can?


woody7
Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA
reply to PlanktonGosh
Sorry, I meant sales, it wasn't an overwhelming success on that front either. Actually they never break even according to their "accountants". That is why some actors take a small % of the gross instead of "profit" or lack there of .
--
BlooMe


R4M0N
Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo

join:2000-10-04
Glen Allen, VA

1 edit
reply to RARPSL
said by RARPSL:

Since this is BitTorrent we are talking about, EVERYONE who is downloading it is also hosting those parts ("pieces") of the file that they have already downloaded. Only once you have finished downloading the full file do you go into full Hosting (AKA Seeding) Mode.
Not entirely accurate... You can download without sharing. At least you could back in the day when I tried it... I haven't used Bit Torrent in a few years now.


Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23

2 edits

1 recommendation

reply to Karl Bode
That movie was a joke. Avatar should have won best picture. BP is about ground breaking filmmaking and HL was just another political piece of dog poop. While Avatar's story was mediocre there is no doubt that it was a revolution in filmmaking.

It was the biggest politically induced Oscar injustice since Shakespeare in Love beat Saving Private Ryan. Shakespeare in what? Exactly.


Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23

1 edit
reply to PlanktonGosh
It did $45M box office plus whatever it does on DVD, PPV, pay TV and broadcast.

It made all the money back for production plus marketing by a mile. It was still a piece of shit, but a piece of shit that made money.


Tom C

@aristocrat-inc.com
reply to PlanktonGosh
Blackmail? HA HA, you are funny.


ArrayList
DevOps
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Brighton, MA
reply to R4M0N
you are correct you can download without sharing.


Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23
reply to Tom C
More like extortion.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:

You know, the muppet that lives in a garbage can?
Whoa... they've been infringing on Sesame Street's trademark for all this time! SICK 'EM!
--
"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.

k1ll3rdr4g0n

join:2005-03-19
Homer Glen, IL
reply to ArrayList
said by ArrayList:

you are correct you can download without sharing.
It's better to keep that to yourself, the prosecution doesn't know that .


siouxmoux2

@sbcglobal.net
reply to pnh102
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences should strip the producers of the Hurt Locker for Best Picture. This movie does not worth seeing, Let along the .torrent file.


RARPSL

join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
reply to R4M0N
said by R4M0N:

said by RARPSL:

Since this is BitTorrent we are talking about, EVERYONE who is downloading it is also hosting those parts ("pieces") of the file that they have already downloaded. Only once you have finished downloading the full file do you go into full Hosting (AKA Seeding) Mode.
Not entirely accurate... You can download without sharing. At least you could back in the day when I tried it... I haven't used Bit Torrent in a few years now.
Unless you use a special hacked BT Client (which does not seed) the only time you are not going to share is when some of the peers you are connected to are Seeds and all the others in the pool either do not connect to you or already have the pieces you have. Under normal situations, you will share the pieces you have with any peer who asks you for them. The protocol is designed to have you share and the fact that you do not actually do so is dependant on what peers you are talking to and what pieces they want/need.

The point I was making is that you host the pieces (or the full file) and if asked you will supply them. The fact that due to the number of Seeds in the pool and the number of leaches (those peers who do not yet have the full file) you are not actually distributing pieces does not alter the fact that you are still hosting them.

pandora
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:2
Reviews:
·ooma
·Google Voice
·Comcast
·Future Nine Corp..

1 edit
reply to SixSpeed
said by SixSpeed:

How do they know who "down loaded" it? Unless they hosted it themselves for distribution, I'm not sure they can catch the D/L'ers, just the hosters.

Hurt Locker failed because nobody wanted to see it, not because of piracy. Plenty of movies still break records in the "piracy" age.
I'm going to assume they send a letter to the person who owns the account that was using the IP address at the time they found it delivering their movie via a file sharing service.

Personally, I'd like to see a warning or two sent before going for damages. At the same time, even a movie like "The Hurt Locker" is entitled to copyright protection.

The other day a friend demonstrated a P2P client installed on his android phone, he said it was great he listed the song or movie he wanted and eventually it would arrive.

At some point copyright owners are entitled to enforce their property rights. Anyone who won't pay $.99 to download a song or $9 a month to subscribe to Netflix and legally get tons of content probably should be concerned about the potential for litigation.

Many people casually violate copyright without thinking about it. IMO that is as wrong as these vultures sending out threats to mostly hapless moms and dads of teens, or worse someone running a router with the SSID "linksys". I think the wireless standard should require wireless off on all routers, and a random password to be set on initial activation unless the user overrides.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."


EveryName
Premium
join:2001-12-05
Montreal
kudos:2

1 edit
reply to Riplin
It won best picture at the Oscars, along with 5 other Oscars, which is funny because no one had ever heard of it, let alone seen it. I watched it after the Oscars, just to see what it was all about. It was okay. I give it 4/10.


WHT

join:2010-03-26
Rosston, TX
kudos:5
reply to Z80A
said by Z80A:

Avatar should have won best picture.
I feel asleep a couple of times in the theater.


NormanS
I gave her time to steal my mind away
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:12
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

1 edit
reply to RARPSL
said by RARPSL:

As to how they can know who is downloading it, all that is needed is to connect to the BT Server and get a list of who is currently downloading and/or seeding it (ie: The Peers).
That would be the "tracker", which has the list. I am not sure I'd classify it as a "BT Server". The only servers carrying the pieces of the file would be the peers.

But, yes, all an investigator needs do to find out who is "serving" in a torrent is connect to the tracker. The investigators' own BT clients will reveal the list of the IPs acting as file servers.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum


jap
Premium
join:2003-08-10
038xx
reply to R4M0N
said by R4M0N:

Not entirely accurate... You can download without sharing. At least you could back in the day when I tried it... I haven't used Bit Torrent in a few years now.
That trusted legal test brokedown several years ago. A court ruled against defense saying piracy behaviors & techniques had become too widely known and understood. Result is case law exists.

It's mute anyway, IMO. Nobody's going to court without multiple confirmed infringement events over time. At that point courts won't care whether uploading occurred or not. Further, copyright holders hate court: bad PR and usually won't collect anything anyway. It's a no-brainer they run an ability-to-pay assessment the minute a name and phys address is in hand. They want settlements even if it's $20 plus a cease&desist/won't disclose terms statement.