| reply to openbox9
Re: Huh? said by openbox9:Did you read Karl's writeup? He provided a URL to the claims website. The opt out campaign I believe to be Robb's attempt to not allow Comcast to settle for a mere $16M. Personally, I see the lack of objections and opt outs as a sign that a vast majority of consumers don't care and weren't really affected. Personally, I see the lack of objections and opt outs as a sign that a vast majority of consumers don't even know about it. |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | And who's fault is that? The lawyers? The court's? Robb Topolski's? The consumers'? |
|
| Comcast's |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | It's Comcast's fault that its customers didn't know about a lawsuit filed on behalf of the customers against Comcast? |
|
 espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2
 ·Clear Wireless
| reply to digitalfreak
said by digitalfreak:Personally, I see the lack of objections and opt outs as a sign that a vast majority of consumers don't even know about it. The vast majority of customers didn't even know or care about the throttling in the first place. |
|
| reply to openbox9
Normally, the law firm that is in charge of the case is to notify the customers. Not the defendant. |
|
|
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | I understand that. I was questioning digitalfreak  's suggestion that it was Comcast's fault for their customers not understanding the merits of a lawsuit and the benefits of opting out, or not. |
|
