site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

LostInWoods

join:2004-04-14
Reviews:
·Windstream

reply to Somnambul33t

Re: Finally

I would argue that physical connections to the home through the public right-of-way *is* a natural monopoly, regardless of whether we "take the government out of it" at this point. The only reason we have a duopoly situation is that cable TV was originally given a government monopoly (usually at the local level) on that service, keeping the phone company out. Only after the cable companies had established themselves in most places was there a push for any openness in the process, but by then the natural monopoly barriers are too high for another entrant to lay their own infrastructure (in any meaningful way - I realize that there are small areas of overbuild scattered around.)

Unless there is a municipally owned power company (like LUS, Jackson Energy, Wilson, NC, etc...) with its own existing infrastructure, the monopoly/duopoly will stand unchallenged. Public power utilities with shareholders to appease will not generally enter that market (and the legal hornet's nest from the duopoly - See LUS for an example), content to remain with their guaranteed rates of return and predictable dividends.

If we want a truly national broadband policy, we have to recognize that the existing "private" infrastructure was largely created under a government monopoly umbrella, and treat it accordingly. IMO, the local loop needs to be separated (by forced divestiture, if necessary) from the service provisioned on the loop, regulated as a monopoly with fixed rate of return, and the national policy should to be to improve the loop with fiber everywhere - rural, urban, small islands in the Aleutians, etc...

Without captive loop subscribers and with common carriage rates for all competitors, the private marketplace for services should explode nearly everywhere.

jdjbuffalo

join:2004-01-17
Denver, CO

Yay! Someone finally gets it. I've been saying this for years.

We need a separate heavily regulated last mile provider(s). Then you will see lots of ISPs offering service to those people over the same lines. At that point we can finally have a true vibrant capitalistic ISP market place.


jimbo2150

join:2004-05-10
Euclid, OH

said by jdjbuffalo:

Yay! Someone finally gets it. I've been saying this for years.

We need a separate heavily regulated last mile provider(s). Then you will see lots of ISPs offering service to those people over the same lines. At that point we can finally have a true vibrant capitalistic ISP market place.
I agree. Municipal installs like UTOPIA did just that and the large companies assumed they were too good to compete and backed out of those areas. If we could get something like that everywhere in the US it would then force the monopolies to compete with smaller providers or die a slow painful death.
--
- "Techie" Jim

Sunday, 19-May 16:06:38 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics