republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal
AuthorAll Replies


Blackbird
Built for Speed
Premium
join:2005-01-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..

2 edits

reply to SUMware

Re: Wikileaks - Exposing Dark Side of Afghan War

One of the greatest dangers to ungoverned release of genuine "raw intelligence" within less than 25 years or so of its creation is that some of the original foreign sources of certain of that intel will very often die as a result. And not merely if their names or titles appear openly in some report... more often because there's such an obvious circumstantial trail in the information details back to the source that he will be readily sniffed out by hostile parties. I've seen it happen before, and I have an extremely difficult time imagining that among 90,000 leaked reports (or especially the 15,000 'delayed' reports not yet released), there will not be significant deadly information to compromise human sources. I can only wonder if the 'greater good' of releasing this stuff will be worth the very real cost to lives that will result. And I have even greater hesitation that Assange or his souce(s) have the insight, experience, or perspective to make such serious judgements on those kinds of details within so many reports.
--
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!" -- P.Henry, 1775


DarkSithPro

join:2005-02-12
Tempe, AZ
kudos:1

said by Blackbird:

One of the greatest dangers to ungoverned release of genuine "raw intelligence" within less than 25 years or so of its creation is that some of the original foreign sources of certain of that intel will very often die as a result. And not merely if their names or titles appear openly in some report... more often because there's such an obvious circumstantial trail in the information details back to the source that he will be readily sniffed out by hostile parties. I've seen it happen before, and I have an extremely difficult time imagining that among 90,000 leaked reports (or especially the 15,000 'delayed' reports not yet released), there will not be significant deadly information to compromise human sources. I can only wonder if the 'greater good' of releasing this stuff will be worth the very real cost to lives that will result. And I have even greater hesitation that Assange or his souce(s) have the insight, experience, or perspective to make such serious judgements on those kinds of details within so many reports.
I'm very surprised Wiki leaks hasn't suffered a huge DDOS, or some type of website comprise/shutdown. They're constantly releasing sensitive documents and there's nothing the most powerful country in the world can do about it? Weird.

SUMware
Premium
join:2002-05-21
kudos:2

1 edit

said by DarkSithPro:

I'm very surprised Wiki leaks hasn't suffered a huge DDOS, or some type of website comprise/shutdown.
Wikileaks.com Hit by DDoS Attack and DNS Server Fire
Wikileaks was down in part because of a DDOS attack
Aussie firewall blocks Wikileaks

etc.


DarkSithPro

join:2005-02-12
Tempe, AZ
kudos:1

said by SUMware:

said by DarkSithPro:

I'm very surprised Wiki leaks hasn't suffered a huge DDOS, or some type of website comprise/shutdown.
Wikileaks.com Hit by DDoS Attack and DNS Server Fire
Wikileaks was down in part because of a DDOS attack

etc.
LOL, nevermind.

SUMware
Premium
join:2002-05-21
kudos:2



DarkSithPro

join:2005-02-12
Tempe, AZ
kudos:1

said by SUMware:

:)
Hey maybe the Governments can convince the DNS-Domain Name Systems to not resolve the wikileaks IP addy:) lol!

Monday, 04-Jun 06:58:21 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics