<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Fuzzy semantics of net neutrality&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Fuzzy-semantics-of-net-neutrality-24660611</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:53:43 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:53:43 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Fuzzy semantics of net neutrality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Fuzzy-semantics-of-net-neutrality-24660611</link>
<description><![CDATA[TahoeBlue posted : Preferential treatment by ISPs for back-scratching partners, and outright discrimination against competitors, are of course totally improper and should be illegal.<br><br>There is a another aspect to the fervor behind net neutrality which is perhaps not so clear, related to how it takes on a life of its own as a perhaps too simplistic black-and-white issue via fuzzy interpretations of what else it means beyond that.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://tahoeblue.wordpress.com/2010/08/14/the-fuzzy-semantics-of-net-neutrality/" >tahoeblue.wordpress.com/2010/08/&middot;&middot;&middot;trality/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Fuzzy-semantics-of-net-neutrality-24660611</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:34:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
