 | reply to Smith6612
Re: [Internet] For anyone seeing speed issues... I did report the congestion issue in Northwest Indiana to a tech. support person at Frontier (to get help upgrading from a Westell 6100G to a GT704WGB 4 port rmodem/router so I don't have to mess with "bridging" anymore). She suggested that they may be installing new hardware and that the process could be contributing to the slowness. Not the most definite answer, but at least I'm on record about the congestion. BTW, if I could rate tech. support people, this pleasant Southern-accented lady would get an A from me. Very helpful, calm, and pleasant (as opposed to the person I talked to on Sept. 4: C or C-) |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:22 | Glad to hear it's been acknowledged, even if of course it wasn't what you may have hoped. None the less, let's see how long it takes to clear up for you. |
|
 | One last followup (in case any other northwest Indiana subscribers are following this): tonight I called Frontier's DSL repair dispatch (presumably based here in Indiana) to cancel a service call made for me by tech. support on Saturday (long story I won't bore you with). I told the dispatcher about the congestion and slow speed and he confirmed that Indiana is having a rough time of it at present (which he claimed was likely inherited from Verizon), but that Frontier is working on the problem. So I'll hope for the best and stay optimistic: after all, turning a pot-holed 4-lane highway into a smooth 8-lane highway often involves months of jammed traffic on a 1-lane highway. |
|
|
|
 | reply to Smith6612 I'm an Ex-Verizon (Now Frontier) customer paying for a 7mb package that is also seeing consistent slowdowns in the evening. Mornings are at the correct speed. I am in Goshen, Indiana, east of Chicago about 2 hours. I called last night, they couldn't find anything wrong, but are running a 24 test that should conclude tonight. Frontier did fess up that at least one other person in my area has complained about the speed issue. I end up watching Netflix on my iPhone because 3g from aT&T is twice (or more) as fast as my DSL at night. This is very frustrating, and I feel like I'm over a barrel due to no DSL competition in this area. |
|
 1 edit | reply to stephen62 THANKS FOR THE UPDATE! I'm looking for a call back after my 24 line test Frontier is running right now. Stupid slow at night. Previous post of mine: "I'm an Ex-Verizon (Now Frontier) customer paying for a 7mb package that is also seeing consistent slowdowns in the evening. Mornings are at the correct speed. I am in Goshen, Indiana, east of Chicago about 2 hours. I called last night, they couldn't find anything wrong, but are running a 24 test that should conclude tonight. Frontier did fess up that at least one other person in my area has complained about the speed issue. I end up watching Netflix on my iPhone because 3g from aT&T is twice (or more) as fast as my DSL at night. This is very frustrating, and I feel like I'm over a barrel due to no DSL competition in this area." |
|
 | reply to Smith6612 Mine's always been consistent. I am on FiOS
 |
|
 mom60 join:2010-11-05 Charleston, WV | Speed has been bad for a week or two here (Charleston, WV). Called and tech support wouldn't even attempt by phone. Sent service tech today (despite me saying I couldn't be here, he caught me home for lunch). Tech said I was probably set "too fast" and if I was set for 3.0 but really running 1.5, I would not even get 1.5. He said he probably needed to set it slower. No!!
Asked him to suggest a speed test website. PC came in at 2.87 download and .77 upload. He acknowledged that this was good. And yet tonight, I still can't watch NetFlix (spending as much time loading as watching).
I hope I've collected all the right data. The ping report covers before, during, and briefly after the file download. I've tried to bold the download portion, but I think it is obvious even without that.
What can I do to fix this? It did not used to be like this. Had Verizon until recent change to Frontier.
Trace route (the * = "less than," because the "less than" symbol messed up text that followed it)
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 *1 ms *1 ms *1 ms dslrouter [192.168.1.1] 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 10.2.11.1 3 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 184.19.254.18 4 25 ms 23 ms 24 ms 184.13.127.161 5 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms xe-0-2-0--0-cor01.asbn.va.frontiernet.net [74.40.2.213] 6 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms ae1---0.cbr01.asbn.va.frontiernet.net [74.40.2.174] 7 25 ms 24 ms 24 ms eqix.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ash.nac.net [206.223.115.69] 8 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms 0.e2-19.tbr1.ewr.nac.net [209.123.11.17] 9 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms 0.e1-4.tbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.122] 10 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms vlan804.esd1.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.2] 11 31 ms 32 ms 32 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Trace complete.
Ping report
Pinging 10.2.11.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.2.11.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255
Please help! |
|
 mom60 join:2010-11-05 Charleston, WV 1 edit | I'm still reading all the information in this thread. In case it is any help, I also did the connection analysis. Results are here:
»174.34.146.20/myspeed/db/report?id=256578
On the capacity test, on the upload graph on the bottom half of the page, there are instances of 100% loss. These correspond to the times I scrolled the test window to see the text during the test (my fault, but pretty severe, isn't it?).
Thank you again for any help you can offer!
Editing . . . I did IP address lookups on the trace route addresses in lines 2-7. All returned almost immediately except line 4, which took some time. That's also where my slowing seems to be occurring. Just wondering . . . |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:22 | Your connection seems to be running fine. Mind providing the Trace Route if possible? |
|
 mom60 join:2010-11-05 Charleston, WV | Is the bold text below the trace route?
Connection seems to be working from PCs now, with adjustments I made to router before running the results shown. But I might as well cancel NetFlix. It is impossible to watch, stopping every 3-6 minutes for a lengthy retrieval.
Trace route (the * = "less than," because the "less than" symbol messed up text that followed it)
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 *1 ms *1 ms *1 ms dslrouter [192.168.1.1] 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 10.2.11.1 3 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 184.19.254.18 4 25 ms 23 ms 24 ms 184.13.127.161 5 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms xe-0-2-0--0-cor01.asbn.va.frontiernet.net [74.40.2.213] 6 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms ae1---0.cbr01.asbn.va.frontiernet.net [74.40.2.174] 7 25 ms 24 ms 24 ms eqix.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ash.nac.net [206.223.115.69] 8 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms 0.e2-19.tbr1.ewr.nac.net [209.123.11.17] 9 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms 0.e1-4.tbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.122] 10 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms vlan804.esd1.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.2] 11 31 ms 32 ms 32 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Trace complete. |
|
 mom60 join:2010-11-05 Charleston, WV | Just got off the phone with NetFlix. They say I had 1.5 bandwidth until November 2, then it dropped to .24 up to .44. I need 1.4 minimum to stream NetFlix. Earlier data was from wired connection. Running NetFlix from wireless, wii. Will do 2 things . . . try speakeasy.net speed test from a wireless PC, and try running NetFlix off a wired connection.
Don't know why bandwidth crashed on November 2, but at least I know it is not my imagination!
Modem/router is Westell 327W. Router firewall is off. MAC address list and WEP security are in use. Don't recall any router changes on November 2. Curiously, NetFlix reported 1.5, but I am subscribed for 3.0 broadband, and wired connection shows d/l rate of 2.8 or so. |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:22 | I would definitely try doing both of what you've suggested. I don't see anything wrong with your connection that would really stand out based on the two tests you posted up. |
|
 mom60 join:2010-11-05 Charleston, WV | Lesson learned . . . never change more than one thing at a time.
Don't know what triggered the original drop in speed, which it appears that I did correct by resetting modem (the results I posted here were all AFTER modem reset/reconfig). Continuing problem was inability to stream NetFlix.
Tried running NetFlix through wired xBox connection, instead of wireless to wii. Didn't work, but there were possible setup issues (using an PlayOn as alternative to xBox Gold, as I don't subscribe). Found that I could stream other content, just not NetFlix.
Tried sending it wirelessly to laptop. Embarrassed to share the final issue discovered. In the course of all my other "tweaking," I'd turned on parental controls in NetFlix. The old sci-fi TV shows son wanted to watch were NR/unrated. NetFlix was killing the transmission because NR won't go through unless parental controls are off.
Thank you for patiently walking me through this. Lesson learned. . . . blushing . . . |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:22 | It isn't a problem. Glad to hear the problem is solved  |
|
 1 edit | reply to Smith6612 I've been having serious slow downs during the evening hours for the past couple of weeks. During the day they are fine. What is happening?
I'm in Indianapolis and have a 7/768k package. My modem is synced fine, never loses sync. 
Sometimes I get great tracert's, sometimes bad...
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\mlapaglia>tracert google.com
Tracing route to google.com [209.85.225.147] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 27 ms 62 ms 40 ms 71.98.113.1 3 59 ms 46 ms 37 ms at-1-1-0-1715.CHI01-CORE-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [1 08.57.128.42] 4 68 ms 38 ms 54 ms as0-0.CHI01-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.20.5 8] 5 68 ms 63 ms 109 ms 0.so-7-2-0.XL4.CHI13.ALTER.NET [152.63.64.177] 6 66 ms 58 ms 83 ms TenGigE0-5-2-0.GW2.CHI13.ALTER.NET [152.63.67.10 6] 7 44 ms 53 ms 65 ms google-gw.customer.alter.net [65.195.243.218] 8 63 ms 69 ms 87 ms 209.85.254.130 9 73 ms 52 ms 83 ms 72.14.232.141 10 51 ms 111 ms 51 ms 209.85.241.37 11 91 ms 87 ms 53 ms 209.85.248.102 12 52 ms 73 ms 221 ms iy-in-f147.1e100.net [209.85.225.147]
Trace complete.
C:\Users\mlapaglia>tracert google.com
Tracing route to google.com [209.85.225.147] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 8 ms 2 ms 9 ms 192.168.1.1 2 195 ms 202 ms 162 ms 71.98.113.1 3 71 ms 67 ms 37 ms at-1-1-0-1715.CHI01-CORE-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [1 08.57.128.42] 4 289 ms 431 ms 462 ms as0-0.CHI01-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.20.5 8] 5 308 ms 242 ms 323 ms 0.so-7-2-0.XL4.CHI13.ALTER.NET [152.63.64.177] 6 397 ms * 524 ms TenGigE0-7-0-0.GW2.CHI13.ALTER.NET [152.63.65.13 ] 7 281 ms 365 ms 309 ms google-gw.customer.alter.net [65.195.243.218] 8 257 ms 325 ms 334 ms 209.85.254.130 9 265 ms 292 ms 243 ms 72.14.232.141 10 357 ms 396 ms 332 ms 209.85.241.35 11 * 244 ms 202 ms 209.85.248.102 12 244 ms 291 ms 287 ms iy-in-f147.1e100.net [209.85.225.147]
Trace complete.
C:\Users\mlapaglia> |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:22 | Are you tracing from a Wireless connection by any chance? Your first hop latency doesn't look too good in the second trace. Also, if you do have Wireless is it secured with WPA-TKIP or preferably WPA2-AES Encryption? |
|
 | No, it's a hardwired connection. I do have wireless (not with the computer i'm tracing from), and it is WPA2 with AES encryption. The slow down only occurs at night, which makes me think the CO is out of bandwidth. But it happened rather suddenly, over the course of a week the speed degraded to where it is now. Around 2 AM the speeds go back to normal. |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:22 | Does obviously sound like CO congestion itself, despite the abnormal latency I noticed in the trace. Anyways, you're not the first to have noticed such an issue propping up in the last few weeks. |
|
 | Is it worth calling them and voicing my concern? |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:22 | It never hurts  |
|