republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to Dagda1175

Re: The faster this spreads...

said by Dagda1175:

...and I'm more interested in HBO style channels doing it, the faster we can dump our cable tv packages. A few dollars more added to our internet bills is far better than the large amounts we pay for cable tv.
Now if your ISP is your cable company what is their incentive for putting HBO on the internet if it's going to cause you to cut cable?

Now if you're paying say $50 for internet and $70 for cable, I'm sure if you were willing to pay $120 a month for internet that allowed you to watch everything you could get on cable your ISP would go for it. But then that kind of defeats the purpose for cutting cable.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

said by BF69:

Now if your ISP is your cable company what is their incentive for putting HBO on the internet if it's going to cause you to cut cable?
The only time I see an ISP/rebroadcaster willing to make that exchange is if retransmission fees become favorable for distribution via the Internet versus traditional means. And I don't see the content owners ever giving up the cash, so this will never happen.

Monday, 04-Jun 00:54:56 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics