pusta
join:2010-08-23
Dallas, TX | reply to iansltx
Re: The part that worries me is... So then it loses all appeal to me. Why would I pay, even a penny per minute, for domestic calls when I can use my cell phone with an unlimited plan? At that point Google Voice would become nothing more than a voicemail service for me, if even that. |
|
| why use unlimited cell phone when you can use cheap mobile broadband plan with google voice ?? would that not be cheaper and have better call quality!!!! DUH!!! |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 Reviews:
 ·Verizon Online DSL
 ·Comcast
| reply to pusta
Use your cell phone then. Everyone with non-unlimited plans will keep on using GVoice.
News flash: by providing the service for free, Google is LOSING money on US/CA calls. Not a ton...they probably pay $10-$15 per month per SIP trunk (simultaneous call) from bandwidth.com, but when you're pushing a million calls ber day you have to have a LOT of SIP trunks. |
|
 SLDPremium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA | said by iansltx:Use your cell phone then. Everyone with non-unlimited plans without privacy / net-neutrality concerns will keep on using GVoice. Fixed it for you. |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 | So...who's net neutral these days? |
|
Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..
| i want to know where the problem is. As far as I can see and read there is no problem. Just a bunch of people wanting regulation for nothing. Just something else for everyone to get and then bitch because they get screwed in the end (Comcast's cap comes to mind- again)
--
www.twopugsbrand.com Kosher, Vegan, and Organic Certified Dog and Cat treats/foods and other products! www.etsy.com/shop/snakx4u/ Organic, Kosher, Gluten Free, Vegan Human Baked Goods |
|
|
|
 King PDon't blame me. I voted for Ron PaulPremium
join:2004-11-17
Franklin, TN
·Comcast
 ·Vonage
| said by hottboiinnc:i want to know where the problem is. As far as I can see and read there is no problem. Just a bunch of people wanting regulation for nothing. Just something else for everyone to get and then bitch because they get screwed in the end (Comcast's cap comes to mind- again) Here we go again...
--
My Music blog:
»www.zunetracks.net |
|
 LegoPower77AbecedarianPremium
join:2002-08-03
Midlothian, VA | reply to SLD
The reason "net neutrality" doesn't sound like a good deal, a syllogism:
Corporations are gaming the system.
The rules and bureaucrats are the ones being gamed and/or are in bed with the corporations.
Adding more rules and regulators to get gamed is not a fix.
So what do you think? |
|
