Reviews:
 ·Cybersurf Intern..
| Not open access at all. They gave the option of matched speed. Which really would kill resellers if they didnt give the matching speed. Which in of itself would end with the government needing to take action.
What we really needed was CO colocation which got denied.
Ultimately now the current situation is that the current existing giant ISPS still keep full control and actual competition of upstart isps has stayed just as impossible.
--
--
if (value == 0)
return value;
else
return 0; |
|
 CanerisErikCanerisPremium,VIP
join:2007-10-03
Toronto, ON
kudos:2 | said by munky99999:What we really needed was CO colocation which got denied. CO colocation has existed for over 10 years, has been used by competitors, and wasn't under consideration in this proceeding. You're confusing the unaggregated ADSL access service that was considered here with CO colocation.
--
Erik - Caneris Inc. |
|
|
|
| reply to munky99999
Agreed. Equal speed over someone else's platform is not the same as equal access to the underlying infrastructure. For that, a truly "open networks" regime would have to be instituted that made points of interconnection readily available to all comers. |
|
