<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Issue Here  is Respect for the Customer in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r2474801</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:34:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:34:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Issue Here  is Respect for the Customer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2474801</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/266221"><b>Kalimba</b></A> : Its "profits before people" more like it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2474801</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:09:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Issue Here  is Respect for the Customer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2469799</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/187406"><b>lml2000</b></A> : Irrespective of inexcusable delays in rebuilding cable plant, and intermittent outages that would lead anyone to conclude that such service is really no service, Adelphia has enraged it subscribers and local franchise authorities with its refusal to provide any information with respect to anticipated dates of launching new services or remedying serious problems with its existing service.<br><br>Adelphia appears to be unique in this respect, and clearly earns, IMHO, the title as the worst cable operator among the major MSOs.  Any local franchising authority would be remiss not to nail this company to the wall when negotiating a new franchise agreement for this operator has demonstrated a propensity to abuse its de facto monopoly to a level unprecedented in recent history.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2469799</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:00:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
