site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·ALL ·Review Your VoIP Provider ·VoIP Providers ·VoIP FAQ ·Porting Rules ·What Codec?
AuthorAll Replies

Mango
www.toao.net

join:2008-12-25
Alberta
kudos:8
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Anveo
·Shaw
·FreePhoneLine
·TELUS
·Callcentric
·callwithus
·LINGO

reply to PX Eliezer

Re: VoIP vs. POTS debate

said by andrewhaji:

I'm being countered by people who think VoIP will never be as reliable as POTS.
Nobody debates that a PAP2T on a residential internet connection will be as reliable as POTS. It won't. But, if as much money, time, and planning were put into a VoIP system as the POTS system, it absolutely would be as reliable. Even if a moderate amount is spent by the technically-minded end user, a sufficiently reliable system can be created. There is no inherent reason why the technology cannot be reliable, if engineered properly.

said by PX Eliezer:

But DON'T try to argue too much with the Potsies. They have their faith.
Truer words could not be spoken

m.
--
Recommended ATA Settings | e164 - make your DID accessible via SIPBroker! | Tips for Reliable Internet Faxing

IanR

join:2001-03-22
Madison, NJ

In my street VOIP is MORE reliable than POTS.
Put simply Verzon has OLD OLD copper (underground) and they have absolutely no desire to spend the money to pull more copper. Inevitably the debate POTS versus VOIP is gradually and irrevocably morphing in gfavor of the latter as copper lines age and are seldom replaced.


Friday, 01-Jun 17:36:10 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics