 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
1 edit | reply to Karl Bode
Re: T-Mobile came in first place in the SW, not last said by karl :
One consistent dismal performer in all regions continues to be AT&T, who came in last place (or tied for last) in every geographical region.
According to that chart - AT&T actually 'beat' VZW and Sprint in the North Central region, and tied for 'Average'. 
A little too aggressive on your story, Karl. |
|
 amarryatVerizon FiOS
join:2005-05-02
Marshfield, MA
 ·Verizon FiOS
| said by en102: said by karl :
One consistent dismal performer in all regions continues to be AT&T, who came in last place (or tied for last) in every geographical region.
According to that chart - AT&T actually 'beat' VZW and Sprint in the North Central region, and tied for 'Average'. A little too aggressive on your story, Karl. I don't have the charts in front of me, but briefly looked at them yesterday. I noticed that while you are technically correct, when AT&T won, it was by the slimmest of margins. When they lost, it was by a landslide. In the areas AT&T won, it wasn't like they had great service, it's just that the others were a tiny bit worse. |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
1 edit | reply to en102
According to that chart - AT&T actually 'beat' VZW and Sprint in the North Central region, and tied for 'Average'.
A little too aggressive on your story, Karl. Yes, my mistake. There was one market where they were simply tied for "mediocre." Every other market they came in last place or tied for last place.
North Central I assume would be old SBC HQ territory? |
|
