site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
100
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


tfrionli
Tom F.

join:2001-06-21
Kings Park, NY
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Optimum Online

MANDATORY

When you decide what side of the fence you're on, you'll create an argument to support it.. but either way you cut it, this one just stinks... You don't need to force people to work, if you create a good work environment,, people should be free to work their jobs without continuous bombardment of "company work rules" and make a fair wage, without the "forced" labor.. c'mon people.
--
tfrionli


cork1958
Cork
Premium
join:2000-02-26

I'd like to know why they didn't simply hire more people, even if only temporarily, to get the job done?

With all the unemployed people out there, there HAD to be some experienced ones to fill that void.

70 hours a week, whether mandatory or not, is ridiculous!! It wouldn't take long to take a toll on your body or mind, whether you saw that immediately or not either.
--
The Firefox alternative.
»www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/


Sniper3142
Slapsho3142

join:2002-01-25
Tustin, CA

said by cork1958:

I'd like to know why they didn't simply hire more people, even if only temporarily, to get the job done?

With all the unemployed people out there, there HAD to be some experienced ones to fill that void.
It isn't that easy in the technical telecom field.

New employees would need to be trained on their specific system, procedures, applications, and roles. This takes time and money that might be better used stretching the existing workforce to accomplish the goal.

Unless the temporary workers are either former employees or temps that have worked in that specific role, there are always training requirements.

Saturday, 02-Jun 11:53:35 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics