how-to block ads
|
|
Share Topic
 |
 |
|
|
 vpokoPremium
join:2003-07-03
Boston, MA
1 edit | reply to hottboiinnc
Re: Complaining about work... said by hottboiinnc:in many states you're not considered full time then. So i hope you know that. that .5hours can mean a lot when it comes down to lay offs or closings you could be screwed in the end and the companies know that.
Thank you for your concern, but my employer considers me full-time despite our 37.5 work week, and as kdwycha pointed out, there is no government standard for what's considered full time. In any case, my point is that, despite what some people think, the job situation is not so dire that employees have to settle for whatever crap an employer wants to force on them. Good workers have options, even now. | |
Reviews:
 ·Comcast
 ·Comcast Digital ..
| to wal mart 34 hours is full time. Of course over 40 is overtime.
I'm not getting into insurance coverage, all I will say is I pay alot and get less and less every year.
ok 90 every two weeks, 250 credit , 500 deductible, and next 2000 80/20 then they pay 100%.
The 500 is killing me, 1 doctor want $100, another wants $380 when only pulling in $520 every two weeks that stinks and I had to drop paying into 401k and stock to get 520. | |
Reviews:
·magicjack.com
| said by mikedz4:The 500 is killing me, 1 doctor want $100, another wants $380 when only pulling in $520 every two weeks that stinks and I had to drop paying into 401k and stock to get 520. That's why I asked "pnh" if his argument that "someone will always work harder for less" (loose quotes) meant he opposes minimum wage laws.
The result of that kind of race to the bottom is what you describe: employers deriving the benefit from a non-living wage, shifting the costs of living to society. In my area, it's common for Walmart employees to be on Medicaid. Basically working and collecting welfare, which contributes to Walmart's low prices (subsidized by society).
I don't know if any firm lines can be drawn. But, we have a pretty long history of drawing lines. Of saying it's *not* ok to expect everything from an employee just because there's always someone else willing to do more for less (at least just to get their foot in the door).
I think we've all worked with people who have bad attitudes and give their labor grudgingly. But, by the same token, there are executives who will use good-faith contributions for their own benefit. That's reflected in what I mentioned about Walmart. And, the simple fact that CEO pay has risen from 33 times the average worker's in 1977 to 300 times the average worker in the year 2000.
No doubt there are malingering workers. But, increasing one's salary 100 fold is not a great example of how workers ought to be thankful and keep giving more. It's hard to feel those workers would be taking anything unreasonable by expecting a little more from their jobs in the face of CEO pay increasing 100 fold. | | |
|
|
