| Nice Isn't that nice after many years of development and full time launches taking place terms change. T-Mo claim of of 4G and 4G speeds is a little out there because it is a 3G Wireless infrastructure. |
|
 FBGuyyippee ki yayPremium
join:2005-03-19 | t-mobile never said they have a 4g network. they said they have the speeds of a 4g network. |
|
|
|
 tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
 ·T-Mobile US
| reply to Big Dawg 23
said by Big Dawg 23:Isn't that nice after many years of development and full time launches taking place terms change. T-Mo claim of of 4G and 4G speeds is a little out there because it is a 3G Wireless infrastructure. I think you missed the point.
WiMax and standard LTE are in the SAME category as HSPA+:
Transitional-4g. 3.9G. Whatever you want to call it. Faster than standard 3g, and slower than 100mbps.
Sprint, ATT, T-Mobile, and Verizon are all in the same boat. Not a single one of them offers or will offer 4g anytime in the next 2 years.
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara |
|
| WiMAX/LTE may not meet the technical definition but they are on the 4G roadmap while HSPA+ is not. WiMAX/LTE may not be superhigh speed to a single user but the infrastructure allows for handling many more users at once at a higher performance level than 3.xG. |
|
tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| said by xenophon:WiMAX/LTE may not meet the technical definition but they are on the 4G roadmap while HSPA+ is not. WiMAX/LTE may not be superhigh speed to a single user but the infrastructure allows for handling many more users at once at a higher performance level than 3.xG. And you base this on what exactly?
Hspa+ calls for a high speed all ip backend. Identical to LTE. The spectral efficiency is nearly identical. It's actually MORE efficient than wimax. Oh, and it's on the 4g roadmap for every single gsm operator. Even Verizon includes hspa+ in what it considers the "4g competition".
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara |
|
Reviews:
 ·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
 ·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..
| reply to xenophon
said by xenophon:WiMAX/LTE may not meet the technical definition but they are on the 4G roadmap while HSPA+ is not. WiMAX/LTE may not be superhigh speed to a single user but the infrastructure allows for handling many more users at once at a higher performance level than 3.xG. HSPA+ is on the roadmap to 4G actually, it's called LTE-Advanced which is the evolution of HSPA+ which is the evolution of GSM technologies 
--
2010 Ford Fusion Sport |
|
