site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
187
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Junker

@ruraltel.net

Just more of the small crap not worth sweating

The itu chose to use the term for certain wireless standards/technology, probably means very little for the members states, most likely they will allow the private sector to build the wireless networks it's want to build-as long they follow spectrum use agreement. Yes the itu is slower than crap going through a snake. The itu is an international body that has to rely on the consensus method to come to agreements, that it can expect the member states to enforce agreement in their respective jurisdictions. In Regards to the United States, the FCC does respect itu agreements when it come to the use of the RF spectrum. In the event the itu is able to trademark 4G in relationships to a certain standard with the US patent and trademark office, I'd expect that agency to enforce that trademark. There a lot of US registered trademarks that use 4G, while I didn't look at all of them, the ones I did where marketing trademarks. Many US citizens of the USA forget that the terms of a treaty the USA enters in do become the law of the land in the US, however I don't know if the USA relationship with the ITU rises to the level of a treat

Alann

join:2010-11-05

quote:
Many US citizens of the USA forget that the terms of a treaty the USA enters in do become the law of the land in the US

No, Most US citizens don't even know that the 'world order' would like that to be the case, but the USA is sovereign and no agreement is superior to the Constitution and its designated laws.

Friday, 01-Jun 21:51:07 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics