<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988543</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:38:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:38:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24991572</link>
<description><![CDATA[mlcarson posted : No AT&T U-verse or FIOS here in southern New Mexico -- only Comcast.  Qwest has some limited coverage for DSL but not in my neighborhood.   I'd switch to FIOS in a minute if it were available.  I don't know how any FTTH system could be less reliable than Comcast.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24991572</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:29:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24989610</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gbcue posted : Yup, I agree, price & value above speed.<br><br>I have *only* 12/1 with U-verse, and would like it a bit faster, but the price point, $40/mo (for internet only) is good.  Bundle that with TV w/ DVR & HD included, and it's the better price & value.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.gbcue.com/">My Blog 2.0</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24989610</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:50:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24989450</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : No because i know people who had fios and switched back to CC because more reliable]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24989450</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:26:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988960</link>
<description><![CDATA[dnoyeB posted : I fail to see why the faster speed wins?  Most users wont use anywhere near the speed of their pipe.  So while you can attract fringe users with a few extra mbps, most users will not jump for that.  Most users will jump for price.<br><br>Comcast price is bad.  Whenever Uverse rolls out in my area, people immediately either jump to Uverse, or get new pricing from Comcast.<br><br>Beyond that, why the triple play?  I have Comcast but they have given up selling that to me.  They always offer some "deal" that does not come close to the price I have with Vonage.  If thats your best deal, I would hate to pay your regular price.  What a gouge.<br><small>--<br>dnoyeB<br>"Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988960</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:58:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988738</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : U-Verse is slower than Comcast D3. FiOS is not widely available. Example: Houston (UVerse mostly) and Denver (Qwest...som VDSL but mosty ADSL2+ and plain old ADSL).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988738</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:22:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988648</link>
<description><![CDATA[caco posted : Easy in Uverse country since nothing Uverse offers is a game changer. The best Uverse can do is 24/3 and that is if you have a dslam in your driveway :).   The video product is esentially the same with minor differences and their phone service is still expensive. If the fight is Uverse vs cable , cable wins. In areas in which the fight is FIOS and cable, cable is holding their own by offering comparable speeds and promotions. Not hard to see why Comcast is doing well and will contiune to do so especially in areas that telcos have not upgraded.<br><small>--<br>Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be changed regularly, and for the same reason.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988648</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:07:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988572</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bob61571 posted : There are large sections of the US, without Verizon FiOS or AT&T U-Verse.<br><br>For example, Ft. Wayne Indiana is the only Midwest metro with Verizon FiOS(sorry, now it's Frontier's baby).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988572</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:48:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>These positive numbers must be in non-Fios/u-Verse areas.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988543</link>
<description><![CDATA[jaw2012 posted : I don't know how someone could choose Comcast triple-play over FTTH or FTTN, even with Xfinity and beyond.  <br><br>Anyone know where there are official numbers on this market scenario? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/These-positive-numbers-must-be-in-nonFiosuVerse-areas-24988543</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:42:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
