<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Shaw is clueless in Canada.&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25170891</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:03:07 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:03:07 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Shaw is clueless in Canada.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25173583</link>
<description><![CDATA[Invade posted : sorry, too annoyed by the bullshit the canadian ISP's are pulling :|]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25173583</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:30:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Shaw is clueless in Canada.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25173537</link>
<description><![CDATA[graniterock posted : I was trying to be funny.  Land overage fees are price gouging.... there's no other way to understand it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25173537</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:23:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Shaw is clueless in Canada.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25172666</link>
<description><![CDATA[Invade posted : No, it's not even. Reason why they charge you over is because they're greedy. Look at Japan/Korea and Europe, they have way faster speeds and 100x cheaper than what we got.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25172666</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:12:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Shaw is clueless in Canada.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25172573</link>
<description><![CDATA[graniterock posted : I thought bandwidth was really expensive.... isn't that why Shaw, Bell and Rogers charge between a $1.00 to $2.50 if you go over your cap?  :uhh:  (Netflix should be bankrupt if that were true)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25172573</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:44:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shaw is clueless in Canada.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25170891</link>
<description><![CDATA[drjp81 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Why should we be burdened with anchors and costs? The reason Netflix can offer an $8.99 service is because they have no costs<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>As if they dont have to pay for the upstream from their streaming servers.<br>What a load of crap.<br><small>--<br>Cheers!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Shaw-is-clueless-in-Canada-25170891</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:23:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
