site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

reply to kingofdsl

Re: The ITU made themselves irrelevant

said by kingofdsl:

They put the U.S. carriers in that position. They have no one to blame but themselves.

4G was always a marketing term anyway. It never was a technical term. The ITU made a mistake when they made a stink about 4G ads in the 1st place.

xenophon

join:2007-09-17

I agree. Delivering 100Mbps as an avg performance for many dozens on one site is not likely in the foreseeable future. Advanced LTE and WiMAX 2.0 can do it but will there be enough spectrum for most carriers? Backhaul is a challenge too.

Requiring 100Mbps for 4G is not very realistic for many many a year. 4G may as well be 10Mbps to distinguish from previous 3G - and yes, it's OK to label HSPA+ as 4G if it looks like a duck.


Friday, 01-Jun 17:50:44 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics