<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Lame to say the least...&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250692</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:05:58 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:05:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25258795</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Yeah, cuz everyone is willing to utilize Linux RIGHT?, although i think its become d even more user friendly than windows has.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25258795</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 02:56:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25257152</link>
<description><![CDATA[bn1221 posted : Time Warner's 128/768 is 34.99 a month.....Suddenly Comcast doesn't look so bad.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25257152</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:56:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25254046</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : There is a difference between homes passed and subscriber growth. The government doesn't give a rats ass for comcast to GAIN customers, just that THE SERVICE is AVAILABLE to an ADDITIONAL 400,000K homes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25254046</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:12:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25253987</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : Are you kidding? in many cases, someone making 20K a year can most certainly afford a computer, unless they've straddled themselves with too many kids they can't afford and got "we the people" to pay for..<br><br>In today's world, in the younger generation's budget, things like having a laptop, or a computer, a smart phone with an un-affordable-to-them service plan, an MP3 player, and other toys are far more important than, I dunno, getting serious and establishing themselves. Besides, its easier to just go 'crash' at a friend's house and float on by. <br><br>see, the extreme examples do work both ways, but really, $20K a year does allow for someone to afford a $300 computer if they really made it a priority.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25253987</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:52:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25253970</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : where did you get subscriber GAIN from that initial blog posting?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25253970</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:47:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25253932</link>
<description><![CDATA[IowaMan posted : Comcast should copy what Medicom has which is 3mb/256 and have it be for $10 well it can be...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25253932</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:31:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25252665</link>
<description><![CDATA[bn1221 posted : 10 bucks for 384K up and 1.5Mbit down isn't bad either.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25252665</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:24:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251725</link>
<description><![CDATA[rody_44 posted :  Not going to happen. Comcast will not expand into service electric territory. I can show you where both service and comcast has lines on the same poles. But neither will expand into each others territory. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251725</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:32:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251375</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cthen posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1771889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1771889');">jupiter837</a>:</said><p>I also wonder how many under 20k a year households have computers. I was once in that position and I didn't have one, or a smartphone, sometimes not even a phone. That's like being offered a free stove when you don't have anything to cook, and then being told well you don't need the stove then do you?<br> </p></div>Your not taking into account that computers don't cost as much as they used to.  Even people in that income bracket can afford the $200 - $400 setups for basic needs.<br><small>--<br>"I like to refer to myself as an Adult Film Efficienato." - Stuart Bondek</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251375</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:01:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251267</link>
<description><![CDATA[Simba7 posted : Norton? Ewww..<br><br>I dumped Norton 4 years ago (ever since it allowed a worm to nail my workstation without stopping it). I switched to ESET IS and haven't had issues since.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251267</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:37:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251113</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : I think they will be using a Microsoft OS since they are bundling it with Norton.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251113</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:59:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251080</link>
<description><![CDATA[Simba7 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/693768" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=693768');">fifty nine</a>:</said><p>A pentium 4 or older core 2 duo running Linux is plenty for basic websurfing and email.</p></div>Actually, a P4 is rather decent on the 'net and even an older C2D is rather impressive. You can do it with a P3, but you're really pushing it (Flash Content, Java, etc).<br><br>Not everyone needs an i3 or newer. A C2D (and even my Pentium E5200) can handle the 'net with ease. My wife's Athlon64 2GHz (single core) doesn't have a problem, either.<br><br>I would suggest at least 512MB of Memory and Windows XP, though. That should be easy enough to come up with.<br><small>--<br>Bresnan 18M/1M<br>MyWS[E5200@3.75GHz,4GB RAM,2x1TB HDDs,Win7]<br>WifeWS[A64@2GHz,2GB RAM,120GB HDD,Win7]<br>Router[2xP3@1GHz,512MB RAM,18GB HDD,SMC 8432BTA,2xDigital DE504,Compaq NC3131,Intel Pro/1000MT,IBM Gigabit Ethernet-SX,Allied Telesyn AT2560FX,Gentoo Linux]</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251080</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:48:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251055</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by Really :</said><p>If Comcast is planning on offering low cost computers....then they didn't mention that to the service techs that will be dealing with those. Rumors are based on speculation and hearsay you know.<br> </p></div>They are going to do the computer part of it with a third party partner, not Comcast techs.  They are also going to use charity orgs and community groups to provide training:<br><br><i> Be eligible for one piece of pre-configured, quality computer equipment (which may <br>include rebuilt PCs, netbooks, or other devices) for less than $150 (<b>the equipment <br>will be sold to the customer by a third-party vendor-partner of Comcast&#146;s, with <br>Comcast providing any subsidy required to bring the equipment cost below $150</b>). <br>4. Have access to web-based, print, and classroom-based training programs, <b>provided <br>in partnership with One Economy and other current and future Comcast community <br>partners in our digital literacy efforts, including Boys and Girls Clubs, and Urban <br>League and National Council of La Raza affiliate organizations.</b>  Comcast will create <br>and fund these programs (although we may seek Foundation and other funds to <br>defray these costs).<br><br>...<br><br>Several computer training and support options will be offered.  At the time of installation, <br>each participating household will received basic instructional materials and a phone number for <br>a dedicated support desk.  The computer equipment will be pre-configured with a &#147;wizard&#148; to <br>facilitate e-mail set-ups and the setting of parental controls.  Shortcuts to &#147;getting started&#148; <br>tutorials will appear on the desktop.  Each piece of equipment will ship with Norton security preinstalled.  Comcast and its partner organizations will offer &#147;training days&#148; at NSLPparticipating schools in Comcast&#146;s service areas, as well as at instruction facilities operated by <br>our community partners.</i>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251055</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:42:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251050</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by Really :</said><p>If Comcast is planning on offering low cost computers....then they didn't mention that to the service techs that will be dealing with those. Rumors are based on speculation and hearsay you know.</p></div>It's not speculation or hearsay, it's from Comcast's own proposal to the FCC.<br><br>Do you really think they would have told the service techs their plan before releasing it to the FCC?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251050</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:41:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250847</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : If Comcast is planning on offering low cost computers....then they didn't mention that to the service techs that will be dealing with those. Rumors are based on speculation and hearsay you know.<br>Each tech site will do their own community involvement for potential new customers.<br>Even if there is a low cost option for internet access, 1MB service is still better than the 756k for DSL that ATT already offers, which is also having union issues, yet again.<br>With the recent merger, some of us service techs can't keep the service working correctly since everything went digital and Motorola is having a hard time keeping up with the demand for new DVR's, so now service is lacking and a lot of fringe benefits for the holidays are now gone, because of merger.<br>I am beginning to question the direction of the cable part of the company and how we can't advance within the company to strict performance standards to keep those in their current positions or bring in a big wave of new hires to perform like they want them to be. just saying......]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250847</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:35:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251007</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1118186" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1118186');">cypherstream</a>:</said><p>Oh man, I hope they expand into my neighborhood.  I moved about 2 miles from their end of line.  It would be nice if they could be added as competition to Service Electric.  Plus SECV doesn't have Remote DVR programming or an iphone/ipad app, or HD VOD (or such an extensive on demand library for that matter).<br> </p></div>You could get a tivo or media center to do all of those things. Seriously, I am never using a crappy cable DVR ever again.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:30:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251000</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : <i>Comcast will expand its existing network by at least 1,500 miles per year for the next <br>three years (2011, 2012, and 2013), making broadband Internet available to an <b>estimated</b> <br>400,000 <b>additional</b> homes; </i><br><br>Note the highlights.<br><br>They didn't commit to 400k new homes being served. They only committed to the 1500 miles of new plant per year for 3 years which they <b>estimate</b> will bring in 400k <b>additional</b> subscribers during that period.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25251000</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:29:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250978</link>
<description><![CDATA[Chubbysumo posted : Where in that does it say they have to be all NEW subscribers?  It simply says they will add 400k subs by the end of a 3 year period. Sure some of them will come from the minuscule 1500 mile per year expansion that they already meet or exceed now, but they can and will probably count returning customers as new subs, contract extensions of existing customers as new subs, and any and all connections that didn't exist to their network(meaning those that had no Internet, that's a "new" sub, and those that reconnect after shutoff, that's a "new" sub, see my point?). I'm gonna guess that if you counted all the people that could be considered "new" subs under that logic for the last 3 years, it probably exceeded 400k easily. Concert lost some, and gained some. See my point, it's a non goal. It's a "goal" that looks good on paper, but is already reached by using twisted logic(you know comcast will), so comcast doesn't really have to change what they are ALREADY doing. Any more stupid questions? This is concert we are talking about. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250978</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:25:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250958</link>
<description><![CDATA[cypherstream posted : Oh man, I hope they expand into my neighborhood.  I moved about 2 miles from their end of line.  It would be nice if they could be added as competition to Service Electric.  Plus SECV doesn't have Remote DVR programming or an iphone/ipad app, or HD VOD (or such an extensive on demand library for that matter).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250958</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:22:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250858</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : They also got pretty specific as to what it would be:<br><br><i><br>Under this Comcast Broadband Opportunity Program (&#147;CBOP&#148;), each eligible <br>participating family will: <br>                           <br>1. Receive the Economy version of our High-Speed Internet Service for $9.95 a month  &#150; <br>a rate for which the household will qualify so long as it meets the &#147;eligibility <br>criteria&#148; below; <br>2. Pay no installation or modem charges or fees (although we may use our self-install <br>program); <br>3. Be eligible for one piece of pre-configured, quality computer equipment (<b>which may <br>include rebuilt PCs, netbooks, or other devices</b>) for less than $150 (the equipment <br>will be sold to the customer by a third-party vendor-partner of Comcast&#146;s, with <br>Comcast providing any subsidy required to bring the equipment cost below $150). <br>4. Have access to web-based, print, and classroom-based training programs, provided <br>in partnership with One Economy and other current and future Comcast community <br>partners in our digital literacy efforts, including Boys and Girls Clubs, and Urban <br>League and National Council of La Raza affiliate organizations.  Comcast will create <br>and fund these programs (although we may seek Foundation and other funds to <br>defray these costs).</i><br><br>So I'm guessing that they may partner with some recycling firm and offer older PCs or maybe get low cost netbooks for low income households.  It really isn't hard to get a basic $150 computer even if it is a couple of years old.  A pentium 4 or older core 2 duo running Linux is plenty for basic websurfing and email. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250858</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:05:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250828</link>
<description><![CDATA[jupiter837 posted : That is a good deal. Never mind the $10 broadband thing. They can get free wifi at a lot of places. So that would help them a lot. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250828</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:57:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250795</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : Comcast plans to offer low cost computers (<$150) to low income households.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250795</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:52:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250769</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1692995" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1692995');">Chubbysumo</a>:</said><p>actually, it makes no mention that these have to be now hook ups, so it could be just adding 400000 subscribers within their service areas, regardless of if they are new hookups or not, would finish that.  They probably go thru 400k total hookups of new, and returning customers every 2 to 3 years, so this is one of those "already gets filled regardless" requirements.  The $10 dollar broadband is gonna not be tru broadband, at less than 4mbps down and less than 1 up, but hey, the FCC has no power to regulate, and the FTC is owned by the stockholders anyways.<br> </p></div>Have you even read the letter?  Didn't think so.  They are adding an estimated 400k homes by adding 1500 miles of plant per year:<br><br><i>Comcast will expand its existing network by at least 1,500 miles per year for the next <br>three years (2011, 2012, and 2013), making broadband Internet available to an estimated <br>400,000 additional homes;</i>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250769</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:47:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250752</link>
<description><![CDATA[jupiter837 posted : I also wonder how many under 20k a year households have computers. I was once in that position and I didn't have one, or a smartphone, sometimes not even a phone. That's like being offered a free stove when you don't have anything to cook, and then being told well you don't need the stove then do you?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250752</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:44:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250712</link>
<description><![CDATA[Chubbysumo posted : actually, it makes no mention that these have to be now hook ups, so it could be just adding 400000 subscribers within their service areas, regardless of if they are new hookups or not, would finish that.  They probably go thru 400k total hookups of new, and returning customers every 2 to 3 years, so this is one of those "already gets filled regardless" requirements.  The $10 dollar broadband is gonna not be tru broadband, at less than 4mbps down and less than 1 up, but hey, the FCC has no power to regulate, and the FTC is owned by the stockholders anyways.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250712</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:37:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250708</link>
<description><![CDATA[gar187er posted : it will be much higher then that....but whther or not 400,000 subs are gained from adding the passings is another story<br><small>--<br><b>I'm better than you!</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-to-say-the-least-25250708</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:34:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lame to say the least...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Lame-to-say-the-least-25250692</link>
<description><![CDATA[ropeguru posted : Only expanding to 400,000 homes over the next three years across their entire franchise areas? That is crap!!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Lame-to-say-the-least-25250692</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:28:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
