site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
5396
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Recent Reviews ·Merger FAQ ·Merger News
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


rblenkhorn
Premium
join:2003-07-15
Bangor, ME
Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·RoadRunner Cable

[speed/latency] speedtest bangor maine


..............................
Transceiver Statistics
Transceiver Revision A2pB020b3.d20h
Vendor ID Code 4D54
Line Mode ADSL_G.dmt
Data Path FAST
..................
Transceiver Information Down Stream Path Up Stream Path
DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec) 3360 864
Margin (dB) 18.1 12.0
Line Attenuation (dB) 51.0 24.0
Transmit Power (dBm) 13.9 11.9
...................
Gateway Status

Software Version: VER:5.01.01.01
Transceiver Revision: A2pB020b3.d20h
Model Name: A90-750018-07

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC



..............................
Statistics
 
ADSL Information
Line State                UP 
Modulation                ANSI (sic: S/B G.Dmt)
Data Path                 fast 
 
                          To Modem   To Internet 
Max Allowed Speed (kbps)  3008       512 
SN Margin (dB)            13.5       - 
Line Attenuation (dB)     48.0       - 
Loss of Signal            0          - 
Loss of Frame             0          0 
CRC Errors                900        3 
 
..............................

--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum


tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Fairpoint Commun..
·Hollis Hosting

reply to rblenkhorn
Are you asking a question?




I'm in Southern NH and have 3000/768 service.

Line Attenuation:            45.00       30.00 dB
Output Power:                12.64       11.92 dB
Errored Seconds:                 0           0
Loss of Signal:                  1           1
Loss of Frame:                   0           0
CRC Errors:                   1522         193
Data Rate:                    3360         864
 

/tom


botayota

join:2008-05-19
Keene, NH

1 edit

Well what kind of Fairpoint service do I have ... that's the question
I'm in Southwest NH, originally was with Verizon before the switch over, and never changed my service, so FP probably gave me their lowest package..?




tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Fairpoint Commun..
·Hollis Hosting

said by botayota:

Well what kind of verizon service do I have ...

For the last couple of years you no longer have Verizon DSL or phone service as Verizon sold VT/NH/ME to Fairpoint.

Judging from speed test looks like 768/128 kbps.

Best way to tell for sure is take a look at modem stats to see sync rate. That will report sync speed. Margin value will indicate if higher speed is possible.

/tom


botayota

join:2008-05-19
Keene, NH

Hi Tom,
My modem is the original that VZN gave me 2 years ago Westell 6100 verizon branded. Can I find these stats you mention in the modem screens ? I'm hoping with a new modem I'll be able to get better stats !!!
Cheers,
BY



tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Fairpoint Commun..
·Hollis Hosting

said by botayota:

Can I find these stats you mention in the modem screens ? I'm hoping with a new modem I'll be able to get better stats

Download the user manual for the specific device.
»www.westell.com/technical-suppor···ort.html

Changing devices will probably not change sync speed. Really old modems only supported ADSL, newer ones also support ADSL2/ADSL2+. If both modem and DSLAM supports the newer standard it will be used preferentially, if not they fall back to originality standard.

I've had Verizon/FairPoint DSL since 2000. Several years ago I purchased a Netopia 3346N modem/router because it supports ADSL2. So far I'm only able connect in ADSL mode as the DSLAM card does not support the newer standard.

Keep in mind for a given speed the difference between ADSL and ADSL2 is pretty minor, but can be significant on marginal or very long line.

/tom


botayota

join:2008-05-19
Keene, NH

Think I found the screen that has the modem stats...
here's what I have:

Transceiver Statistics

Transceiver Revision: 7.2.3.0
Vendor ID Code: 4
Line Mode: ADSL2+ Mode
Data Path: Interleaved

Transceiver Information Downstream Path Upstream Path
DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec) 861 156
Margin (dB) 14.0 0.0
Line Attenuation (dB) 43.0 24.0
Transmit Power (dBm) 15.7 11.6

Looks like I should be getting better possibly with an ADSL2+ modem.

I know I'm on a long line here, probably close to the end of the coverage.

Thanks for your help,
BY



tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Fairpoint Commun..
·Hollis Hosting

The modem is already using ADSL2+.

Based on attenuation you are 11-12,000 feet. With a decent circuit ought to qualify for 3000/768 speed. Your margin numbers are pretty strange. The 0.0 dB on upload must be a fluke since if it really was 0 dB modem would not be able to sync. The relatively high transmit signal levels are also indicative of problems with the line.

Try rebooting the router, see if that changes margin values. Once margin gets below 6 dB modem has a hard time maintaining sync. Margin should be at least 9-10 dB, the higher the better.

If you have a NID temporally connect to modem to the NID and see if stats improve. If so something within your residence (wiring or equipment) is degrading DSL.

/tom


lobster11

join:2004-01-19
Brunswick, ME

4 edits

reply to rblenkhorn
[Update] Today I ran the same speed test to NYC and my Download speed dropped about 80% to 214 Kbps, while Upload was the same. That is very surprising for a Saturday. I believe that FairPoint's backbone connection is in Boston, which means that they aren't responsible for backups after that. The Line Quality test is supposed to show where the backup occurred, and showed 7% packet loss at a server named VZ-DSLDIAL-PTLDME-1, which is FairPoint's servers in Portland. They likely have a capacity or possibly a hardware problem with their servers in Portland, which for what they charge is frankly unacceptable. Should that problem continue, it's time to switch to another vendor.

I'm on the Portland-east network and just got my rated speed using the Java speed test to NYC: Download: 1524 (Kbps), Upload: 377 (Kbps). Transceiver Stats (for me that's under the "Troubleshooting" menu): Margin 15.0 12.0, Line Attenuation 56.5 18.5, and Transmit Power 13.0 11.0.


xQim

join:2003-09-20
01234
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Fairpoint Commun..

reply to rblenkhorn

Click for full size
Wow, unFairpoint is terrible if you haven't already noticed. You will almost never get the advertised speed unless you live in a heavily competitive market. If cable is available, why would you ever consider DSL as cable blows the doors off of DSL. Verizon was smart. They sold ME,NH,VT out to unFairpoint knowing they couldn't afford to compete. They will eventually go bankrupt and Verizon will buy it back for less than they sold it. And you live in Bangor, surely there is RR..what were you thinking?

Check this out.
new.bangordailynews.com/2011/01/···billion/)

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

Why would they want to buy it back? If it is too costly to provide service, that doesn't change when Fairpoint goes bankrupt.

BTW, here in the south S.F. Bay Area, DSL is cheaper than cable; if you would rather pay less, and are satisfied with slower download. And 3 Mb service isn't so different from 6 Mb service for most things, other than downloading large files.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum



again

@rr.com

reply to xQim
Verizon does not want the rotten copper wires back, my town has never been rewired in the last 80 years.


NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

said by again :

Verizon does not want the rotten copper wires back, my town has never been rewired in the last 80 years.

:) My neighborhood was orchard just fifty years ago. Though AT&T replaced an old 50-pair F2 binder with a new 100-pair F2 binder just about a year ago.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

xQim

join:2003-09-20
01234
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Fairpoint Commun..

reply to rblenkhorn
I had unFairpoint for 2 months with brand new lines installed to the house and directly to the modem. I live less than 2500ft away from the CO and had the 3Mbps/768Kbps package and could never get over 1.5Mbps anytime of the day. I couldn't even watch any videos because it would always buffer. I'm very sorry for your service. To the other poster, you make a valid point which I overlooked. I just thought it would be a smart business deal to sell to a company teetering on bankruptcy and then when they finally go under, buy it back for cheaper. It's to bad that Wireless internet is restricted as far as data usage, like 5GB. It used to be unlimited. It's kind of sad because I can get faster speeds than yours using my friends Verizon wireless 3G modem, up and down.



astokes

join:2000-08-11
Bangor, ME

Well if anyone in Bangor is looking for a better DSL provider give GWI a shot, I switched from Timewarner slowrunner (terrible in my area, oversold with no ETA on a fix) I ordered the naked uncapped DSL and get these speeds, im 5000 ft from the CO.




again

@rr.com

That's strange, they use Fairpoint wires. There web site even states, speed has to do with Fairpoint congestion.



astokes

join:2000-08-11
Bangor, ME

Not true, they do use fairpoints wires to the CO but they have their own equipment installed in the CO and their own upstream providers, I dont see any slowdown during peak times but a friend from work close by on Fairpoint sees terrible evening slowdowns.


NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to again

said by again :

That's strange, they use Fairpoint wires. There web site even states, speed has to do with Fairpoint congestion.

From a post in the AT&T forums, where AT&T is also having congestion issues, apparently depends upon whether congestion is at the ATM layer (affects both ILEC and CLEC), or at the first ILEC IP hop (only affects the ILEC).
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum


again

@rr.com

reply to astokes

said by astokes:

Not true, they do use fairpoints wires to the CO but they have their own equipment installed in the CO and their own upstream providers, I dont see any slowdown during peak times but a friend from work close by on Fairpoint sees terrible evening slowdowns.

So GWI runs there own fiber from the CO, didn't know that.

Friday, 01-Jun 17:57:39 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics