republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

elray

join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to MyDogHsFleas

Re: So, how is this a Network Neutrality violation?

said by MyDogHsFleas:

You would put a regulation out there that says a company can NOT offer a lower-priced option that satisfies some set of their customers, and also a higher-priced option that provides "the full Internet" ?

If THAT'S what Net Neutrality means... I'm out.

You're basically saying you don't want innovative, lower-priced offerings that satisfy consumers who buy them, and make money for the companies providing them, thereby funding investment in the network and the offerings -- because they're not what YOU want.

That's exactly what the DSLR crowd wants.

Every plan must be "Unlimited" / "All You Can Eat" without restriction.
We can't have people making their own choices, that would be unfair to the "power users", who would lose their subsidy. Just another form of tax / creeping socialism.

Fortunately, so far, we can at least choose NOT to subscribe. Eventually, someone will propose that these services are a "right", and "must be free", and then we'll really pay.

Friday, 01-Jun 17:57:53 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics