site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
4214
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Cal-Iso ·Weather ·Official LA web site
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
AuthorAll Replies


sholling
Premium
join:2002-02-13
Hemet, CA
kudos:1

1 edit

Antonovich: LA's Tab For Illegal Immigration > $1Billion

And LA County is broke and likely to declare BK within the next three years.
quote:
Annually the cost of illegal immigration to Los Angeles County taxpayers exceeds over $1 billion dollars, which includes $350 million for public safety, $400 million for healthcare, and $500 million in welfare and food stamps allocations. Twenty-four percent of the County’s total allotment of welfare and food stamp benefits goes directly to the children of illegal aliens born in the United States.

“Illegal immigration continues to have a catastrophic impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” said Antonovich. “The total cost for illegal immigrants to County taxpayers exceeds $1 billion a year – not including the millions of dollars for education.”
»antonovich.co.la.ca.us/Pages/Pre···109.html

--
"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
--FREDERIC BASTIAT--


No_Strings
Premium,Mod
join:2001-11-22
The OC
kudos:6

Notably absent from the press release is the economic benefit the city enjoys. I'm not defending illegal immigration, but shouldn't any fair and balanced conversation tally both sides of the ledger?



dogma
XYZ
Premium
join:2002-08-15
Boulder City, NV
kudos:1

said by No_Strings:

Notably absent from the press release is the economic benefit the city enjoys. I'm not defending illegal immigration, but shouldn't any fair and balanced conversation tally both sides of the ledger?

Moreover, what about the future benefit? Remember without immigration, legal or otherwise, the U.S. would be at a zero or negative population growth rate. As 10,000 baby boomers retire each day now, and for the next 19 years, who do they think is going to be paying taxes for the gub'ment to dole out social security?

The Teajadist are misguided in terms of immigration...unless of course they all plan to voluntarily renounce any acceptance of any form of government wealth transfer payments. AKA: Social Security/Medicare/Medicaid/ etc.


ohdan

join:2008-11-10
Adelanto, CA
Reviews:
·Charter
·Verizon FiOS

said by dogma:

Remember without immigration, legal or otherwise, the U.S. would be at a zero or negative population growth rate.

If my wife and I have three children, have we not +1'ed the population? Or are you talking trends? Anyway, I look forward to serving my brown overlords. (I'm disappointed in my black Muslim socialist fascist).


dogma
XYZ
Premium
join:2002-08-15
Boulder City, NV
kudos:1

said by ohdan:

If my wife and I have three children, have we not +1'ed the population? Or are you talking trends? Anyway, I look forward to serving my brown overlords.

Check this out: »Astonishing Census FACTS of the week..
said by ohdan:

(I'm disappointed in my black Muslim socialist fascist).

We all are.


TheRul
Why Not You?
Premium
join:2007-09-18
Gilroy, CA
kudos:1

I am going to take a semi unpopular stand...
So what if we go into the negative population growth for a little while. Less people means less welfare. Less need for big brother. Better health of the flora and fauna.
More food for less
Less crowds
Less pollution
More resources in general
More jobs for blue collar workers
the dollar will go up. Because we will not need to have so many bills floating around to put in pockets.

Do not replace the baby boomers when they go, and decrease the population. It would be better in the long run.
--
»So the holidays are on us again...



No_Strings
Premium,Mod
join:2001-11-22
The OC
kudos:6
Host:
Wireless Networking
All Things Unix
Cox HSI
Efficient
Southwest Chat

Your argument is valid to a point, but you're leaving out the other side of the equation.

Fewer people means less demand for good and services, lower wages, fewer jobs, less tax revenue, etc.

The value of the dollar would, in fact decline.



TheRul
Why Not You?
Premium
join:2007-09-18
Gilroy, CA
kudos:1

I agree with the fewer jobs, but less people looking for those jobs, so I submit that the jobless rate (percentage) would significantly decline.
Less tax revenue, yes, but less demand for the taxes. What now takes 3 police, may only take 2. The Health and human services/welfare no longer need such large staff. As well as the payouts are no longer as many.
Lower Wages also will mean lower prices, as those who wish to do business will need to drop their prices, so the car that now costs 15k will cost 7k.
The need to import will drop,

The dollar goes up in value.
--
»So the holidays are on us again...



sholling
Premium
join:2002-02-13
Hemet, CA
kudos:1

reply to No_Strings

said by No_Strings:

Your argument is valid to a point, but you're leaving out the other side of the equation.

Fewer people means less demand for good and services, lower wages, fewer jobs, less tax revenue, etc.

The value of the dollar would, in fact decline.

So misguided. Keynesian economics is soooo yesterday and soooo discredited. We don't need an illegal alien stimulus we need them to leave so that the state does not go bankrupt and we need to reduce taxes and regulation so that we can produce and export more cheaper. Remember that illegals cost the California taxpayers $10 billion a year. That's half the current budget shortfall.

»usgovinfo.about.com/od/immigrati···gals.htm
--
"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
--FREDERIC BASTIAT--


dogma
XYZ
Premium
join:2002-08-15
Boulder City, NV
kudos:1

reply to TheRul

said by TheRul:

I am going to take a semi unpopular stand...
It would be better in the long run.

You would be correct if it wasn't for that pesky little $14,057,553,679,889.00 ($14 Trillion and rising) debt we have outstanding. It's $112 Trillion in total unfunded liabilities.

That's "currently" $127,000 per taxpayer. Extrapolate the total debt, and that's close to $1 Million per taxpayer over the next 40 years or so. Had we 3x the taxpayer base (damn near 1 billion citizens), it would be manageable.

Unfortunately, us baby boomers ain't goin' nowhere that we can't suck up retirement benefits. We are the ones that ran up this debt. We are the ones that, without shame and with malice of forethought wrote ourselves future-taxpayer-funded sweetheart retirement deals. And unlike the self-respecting previous generations, us baby boomers simply refuse to die.

See, our baby boomer math says we put in about $100,000 in SS during our working careers. But we will take out about $600,000 in benefits. What a deal, eh? 6X ROI!! We must have created the Amway of social programs.

Problem is we elected politicos that told us what we wanted to hear, and as long as the bread and circuses were in high supply, we didn't care. Even when the truth comes to light, and we all now know that our little Social Security ponzi scam is just that, a scam ... we still want our M-O-N-E-Y. Even if it means following generations have to pay for it.

You're thinking Logans Run. I'm thinking the existing number of illegal immigrants just ain't cuttin' it ... we should forcibly annex Mexico and Canada to get some fresh, young taxpayers!


TheRul
Why Not You?
Premium
join:2007-09-18
Gilroy, CA
kudos:1

I once thought about the feesability of forcibly annexing Mexico...
Then I thought about the cost of cleaning up the place so it is "legal" as far as Federal goes. The cost greatly out ways the benefit. You know, I thought if the Colorado River went through there, it might have had some nice areas... oh wait, it did. Hover Dam stopped it. Maybe we should just annex them, as an apology.
--
»So the holidays are on us again...



No_Strings
Premium,Mod
join:2001-11-22
The OC
kudos:6
Host:
Wireless Networking
All Things Unix
Cox HSI
Efficient
Southwest Chat

reply to sholling
Easy, Sparky. As I said, I'm not condoning illegal immigration. I'm also not advocating waves of legal immigration to add demand for products and services.

I'm saying two distinct things:

1. Businesses derive huge benefits from illegal labor. For that reason, it has been largely ignored by our Federal government for many years, both by the Executive and Legislative branches and by both parties.

Talking about either the economic benefit or the costs out of context is not fair. You have to look at the issue in the aggregate. Most conversations conveniently eliminate one side of the equation to support a political position.

2. Simply reducing the population isn't a fix for anything other than resource consumption. Again, I was pointing out that fewer people, without regard to citizenship, has a more complex effect than "the dollar gets stronger." That's oversimplifying.

I didn't say our economy would collapse if we send "them" all back home.



r81984
Fair and Balanced
Premium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
Reviews:
·row44
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to sholling
I was blown away when I heard how they get away with this in Houston.
They knowingly give illegals welfare money and do not deport them because their kids are anchor baby citizens.
The kids are citizens of both countries. They just need to deport the parents with the kids and when the kids are 18 they can leave their parents and go the US if they want to.

They could also voluntary let the parents give their kids up for adoption to US families that want a child if the parents do not want to take the kids back with them when they are being deported.

The only benefit from illegals is for corrupt companies to exploit them for cheap labor. Sure there is extra tax dollars and the companies owners get rich, but that is just wrong to allow exploitation like this in the US.
Any so called benefit anyways is so small it does not have any impact on the economy beyond just a few shady company owners.

Any benefit claimed that says illegals spend money which helps legal businesses is BS. If any business out there would lose enough customers to go out of business because they deported all illegals then it should not have existed in the first place. Again its just more exploitation of illegals to get rich.
--
Your behavior is inconsistent with your desire to be treated like everyone else.



r81984
Fair and Balanced
Premium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
Reviews:
·row44
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to TheRul

said by TheRul:

I once thought about the feesability of forcibly annexing Mexico...
Then I thought about the cost of cleaning up the place so it is "legal" as far as Federal goes. The cost greatly out ways the benefit. You know, I thought if the Colorado River went through there, it might have had some nice areas... oh wait, it did. Hover Dam stopped it. Maybe we should just annex them, as an apology.

I would be for this.
Whats another 14 trillion right???
The US is the country of unlimited money. We might as well annex Mexico and clean it up no matter what it costs.
--
Your behavior is inconsistent with your desire to be treated like everyone else.


TheRul
Why Not You?
Premium
join:2007-09-18
Gilroy, CA
kudos:1

said by r81984:

said by TheRul:

I once thought about the feesability of forcibly annexing Mexico...
Then I thought about the cost of cleaning up the place so it is "legal" as far as Federal goes. The cost greatly out ways the benefit. You know, I thought if the Colorado River went through there, it might have had some nice areas... oh wait, it did. Hover Dam stopped it. Maybe we should just annex them, as an apology.

I would be for this.
Whats another 14 trillion right???
The US is the country of unlimited money. We might as well annex Mexico and clean it up no matter what it costs.

are you forgetting all the blue collar jobs running below the border? There is a tax base there too...
Ok, and a bunch of UFO flaps, but that is a positive side affect.
--
»So the holidays are on us again...


sholling
Premium
join:2002-02-13
Hemet, CA
kudos:1

2 edits

reply to sholling

There are 2 million unemployed in California - load the illegals on buses and ship them south in mass. Those 2 million unemployed citizens can take their pick of the job opening and we can lease out our prison population to pick strawberries and recover some of our prison costs. There ya go reduce unemployment among citizens and their kids, reduce welfare costs, reduce prison costs, and solve half the budget crisis in one quick simple move.

Keep in mind that those entry level fast food, dish washing, table busing, and gardening jobs used to be done by Americans high school and college kids gaining work experience and pocket money. Kids need those opportunities. Yes there was life before mommy and daddy provided a BMW or Audi for the pampered little darlings.

BTW it looks like after being rescued by US taxpayers Government Motors is showing its appreciation by expanding production in Mexico.

»www.industryweek.com/articles/gm···462.aspx
--
"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
--FREDERIC BASTIAT--


No_Strings
Premium,Mod
join:2001-11-22
The OC
kudos:6

And with them would go the demand for the cars, food, housing, TVs (sorry, dogma), financial services and other goods they consume.

Bad time to shrink the economy, isn't it?



r81984
Fair and Balanced
Premium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
Reviews:
·row44
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T DSL Service

said by No_Strings:

And with them would go the demand for the cars, food, housing, TVs (sorry, dogma), financial services and other goods they consume.

Bad time to shrink the economy, isn't it?

For that to happen you would be saying that legit business have enough illegals/criminals as customer to put them out of business if they were all deported.
That is BS any you know it.

Any business that is only successful from money from illegals is not a business that should have existed in the first place.
These are businesses that are making money through the exploitation of illegals/criminals from other countries who cannot legally work here. It is wrong.

Except a few crappy rental properties and stores that opened in illegal ghettos legit business will not go under from deporting illegals. Only those businesses exploiting illegals will go under.

We have plenty of unemployement in this country to fill any jobs opened after deporting illegals.
--
Your behavior is inconsistent with your desire to be treated like everyone else.


ohdan

join:2008-11-10
Adelanto, CA
Reviews:
·Charter
·Verizon FiOS

reply to No_Strings

said by No_Strings:

And with them would go the demand for the cars, food, housing, TVs (sorry, dogma), financial services and other goods they consume.

Steve has fallen victim to the "lump of labor" fallacy - that there is an x amount of fixed jobs. As you have correctly noted, an overall population decrease would diminish employment opportunities.


dogma
XYZ
Premium
join:2002-08-15
Boulder City, NV
kudos:1

reply to r81984
I understand your frustration. I ask this to everyone that feels as strongly as you do: Are your hands clean?

Consider this:
Have you ever price shopped? i.e., chose a less costly product (or service) such as a cut of chicken, eggs or a gallon of milk at the grocery store? Do you always purchase the most expensive staples?

Patronized a restaurant where you had a reasonable suspicion that the bus boy or water server couldn't understand your request for a clean fork?

Shopped at any Walmart, ordered from Pizza hut, Home Depot, Target Stores at any time ... ever? (all of these companies ...plus thousands more...have been convicted of hiring illegal aliens)

At your work, who cleans the bathrooms, does the landscaping and takes out the trash? Have you confirmed these individuals can at least speak English?

Who do you use to mow lawns, paint, remove rubbish and the like? Are they, or their workers legal?

I have yet to encounter a person that can honestly say they have never, ever, under any circumstances, spent their money in the above fashion.

Do you believe that people who come to the U.S. are primarily coming to get on welfare and have babies that too will be on welfare as their primary motivation?

Or do you believe these illegal immigrants were implicitly invited to the U.S. to work by employers who had to be price competitive in a culture of consumers that are primarily price conscious?

The fact of the matter is if you, or anyone else has ever been price sensitive (answered in the affirmative to any of the above questions), then you are just as culpable as Walmart for attracting and hiring illegals. when you look at a pound of chicken in the meat isle of your supermarket, and Zackys is 10% less than Foster Farms for the same exact cut, and you choose Zackys, you directly incentivise Foster Farms to lower their internal cost as to be competitive ... or simply shut its doors and go out of business.

None of our hands are clean.


Tuesday, 21-May 15:21:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics