<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Satellites?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Satellites-25582717</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:53:40 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:53:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellites?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25583805</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : that can be done by using LTE @home stations/modems like Clear. They could also route Voice over LTE/IP and be done with it. the voice on sat could be a back-up especially otherwise there will be a noticeable delay in just using a dish for voice.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25583805</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:12:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellites?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25583565</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : they don't have to totally use the sat for Internet. They can easily create a LTE network for that just as Clear does using a home base modem.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25583565</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:17:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellites?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25582813</link>
<description><![CDATA[WHT posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/141383" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=141383');">Karl Bode</a>:</said><p>My understanding is it's simply for the voice component in some rural markets. <br> </p></div>Which rules it out for low latency internet access. Lightsquared's salient selling point is to eliminate the need for terrestrial upstream backhauls (PtP microwave or fiber) from the tower sites.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25582813</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:28:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellites?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25582772</link>
<description><![CDATA[bugabuga posted : As far as I remember their plan was to use satellite link for hard-to-reach rural places, where getting fiber to the tower is impossible.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://hyperom.com">Hyperom: Rants about life, politics, technology</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25582772</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:19:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellites?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25582727</link>
<description><![CDATA[Karl Bode posted : My understanding is it's simply for the voice component in some rural markets. Satellite integration was required as part of conditions attached to the spectrum Lightsquared is using, though they recently got some FCC leniency on those requirements I'm still reading through...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellites-25582727</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:07:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Satellites?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Satellites-25582717</link>
<description><![CDATA[Duramax08 posted : Im havent heard of this lightsquared that much, But the article menitons satellites. How does this work? Wont this have really bad latency?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Satellites-25582717</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:05:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
