dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
440

pende_tim
Premium Member
join:2004-01-04
Selbyville, DE

pende_tim

Premium Member

Junpiers?

Hope they work better on the backbone than they do as routers on the DSL network.

DarkLogix
Texan and Proud
Premium Member
join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX

DarkLogix

Premium Member

said by pende_tim:

Hope they work better on the backbone than they do as routers on the DSL network.

how they work better in the backbone than as 48 port gig switches or as nat devices

hope they work pieriod
xenophon
join:2007-09-17

xenophon

Member

they already did it for Paris to Frankfurt.

batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium Member
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ

batterup to pende_tim

Premium Member

to pende_tim
said by pende_tim:

Hope they work better on the backbone than they do as routers on the DSL network.

"Routers on the DSL network"; slowly I turn, step by step...

»www.youtube.com/watch?v= ··· =related

pende_tim
Premium Member
join:2004-01-04
Selbyville, DE

1 edit

pende_tim

Premium Member

NM
34764170 (banned)
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

34764170 (banned) to DarkLogix

Member

to DarkLogix
said by DarkLogix:

said by pende_tim:

Hope they work better on the backbone than they do as routers on the DSL network.

how they work better in the backbone than as 48 port gig switches or as nat devices

hope they work pieriod

Nice troll posts.

A very significant portion of the Internet's traffic at the carrier backbone levels for various Tier 1/2 carriers (and smaller) and edge routing uses Juniper routers and they work fine. Yes, there are bugs in JunOS from time to time... its not like Cisco's IOS doesn't have a bug or 100.

batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium Member
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ

batterup to pende_tim

Premium Member

to pende_tim
said by pende_tim:

NM

Have you been to X-Ray's yet?