site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal
AuthorAll Replies

grazed

join:2006-10-15
Havertown, PA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

reply to The Snowman

Re: Nanny cam

Wow, this happened in the town I live in. Didn't even know it happened until I looked at the story.

One thing to note is that these homes around here, especially that one, tend to hire poor people out of the city (Philadelphia) to cut on costs. I guess this is one side effect of hiring cheap labor.


goalieskates
Premium
join:2004-09-12
Knoxville, TN

I don't know that you can attribute it to cheap labor. We had a similar case near here, and the two nurses who committed the offenses were stupid enough to record their deeds. They obviously had enough $$ for cameras/cell phones.

I'd love to believe it was a case of poor folks who don't know better, but it's more a comment on the values of society in general.


grazed

join:2006-10-15
Havertown, PA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

said by goalieskates:

I'd love to believe it was a case of poor folks who don't know better, but it's more a comment on the values of society in general.

I don't mean they were ignorant of what they were doing, I mean that they hire dodgy employees for cheap instead of hiring more expensive employees with experience / education in the field.


jvmorris
I Am The Man Who Was Not There.
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-03
Reston, VA

More likely, it's not so much that the employees are 'dodgy' as they find themselves overworked because management hasn't hired enough of them to deal with the workload.

It's a simple solution -- someone screws up to stay on schedule, you blame the employee and then moan "If only I had known!"

It's a great way to maximize profits, especially if your employees actually do care about their patients and are therefore unlikely to complain (publicly) about being overworked. Once the employees find out how the system works, they become primarily interested in getting a job with a better firm -- and part of that is having no adverse comments on your references. So, they shut up, grin and bear it -- until the pressure becomes too much.

Yes, they should take it out on their managers, but ... which ones? Who makes the policy and who is simply trying to make it work as best as possible?
--
Regards,
Joseph V. Morris



goalieskates
Premium
join:2004-09-12
Knoxville, TN

reply to grazed

said by grazed:

said by goalieskates:

I'd love to believe it was a case of poor folks who don't know better, but it's more a comment on the values of society in general.

I don't mean they were ignorant of what they were doing, I mean that they hire dodgy employees for cheap instead of hiring more expensive employees with experience / education in the field.

Oh, I'm sure you're right about that as far as it goes. But I was commenting as much on the ethics of the people doing the hiring - they'll not only hire cheap, they don't supervise and they don't care what happens as long as they turn a profit. Then when something like this happens they'll feign innocence and blame it all on rogue employees, like they had no part in putting those people to work in the first place.

Friday, 01-Jun 21:59:04 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics