Rekrul
join:2007-04-21
Milford, CT Reviews:
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to silentlooker
Re: SCOTUS can't get anything right lately said by silentlooker:You mean ignore the law? If this is so bad get new federal law passed banning this practice. Are you really that dumb? Individual voters can't contribute that much money to political campaigns. Organizations like the EFF struggle to get funding. Meanwhile, the corporations donate MILLIONS to the corrupt politicians. Who do you think they're going to listen to? |
|
| said by Rekrul:said by silentlooker:You mean ignore the law? If this is so bad get new federal law passed banning this practice. Are you really that dumb? Individual voters can't contribute that much money to political campaigns. Organizations like the EFF struggle to get funding. Meanwhile, the corporations donate MILLIONS to the corrupt politicians. Who do you think they're going to listen to? That is irrelevant, Supreme court made right decision because law didn't prohibit arbitration. |
|
Rekrul
join:2007-04-21
Milford, CT Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| said by silentlooker:That is irrelevant, Supreme court made right decision because law didn't prohibit arbitration. So legal = right? I guess that means that slavery was ok as long as it was legal... |
|
| said by Rekrul:said by silentlooker:That is irrelevant, Supreme court made right decision because law didn't prohibit arbitration. So legal = right? I guess that means that slavery was ok as long as it was legal... It's not the job of the Supreme Court to decide what's right, it's their job to rule on the law. Nothing more, nothing less. Laws are supposed to be changed by Congress, not by the Court.
--
Dresden - I work in Accounts Payable.
Random Bad Guy - In what capacity?
Dresden - I make sure everyone gets what's coming to them. |
|
| reply to Rekrul
said by Rekrul:said by silentlooker:That is irrelevant, Supreme court made right decision because law didn't prohibit arbitration. So legal = right? I guess that means that slavery was ok as long as it was legal... Until slavery was prohibited, yes unfortunately slavery was legal for some period. |
|
 EUSKill cancerPremium
join:2002-09-10
canada
 ·voip.ms
| said by silentlooker:said by Rekrul:said by silentlooker:That is irrelevant, Supreme court made right decision because law didn't prohibit arbitration. So legal = right? I guess that means that slavery was ok as long as it was legal... Until slavery was prohibited, yes unfortunately slavery was legal for some period. Still is: Now the slaves are the non-corporate tax paying persons.
--
~ Project Hope ~ |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | reply to footballdude
said by footballdude: Laws are supposed to be changed by Congress, not by the Court.
Then get rid of the court. |
|
