site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to fAcEtIOUs

Re: Game consoles & streaming devices driving video growth

said by fAcEtIOUs:

eating up the bandwidth.
[att=2]

Isn't that the point of bandwidth to be used? Hopefully to full capacity.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

Not when usage drives the need for CAPEX, or impacts other consumers in a negative manner.



fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

reply to DataRiker

said by DataRiker:

said by fAcEtIOUs:

eating up the bandwidth.
[att=2]

Isn't that the point of bandwidth to be used? Hopefully to full capacity.

No not really. If this were electricity - you may have 200 amp service in your home but you're not going to draw 200 amps continuously, even during prime time. Even if the electricity could be generated the grid cannot support that.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

said by fifty nine:

said by DataRiker:

said by fAcEtIOUs:

eating up the bandwidth.
[att=2]

Isn't that the point of bandwidth to be used? Hopefully to full capacity.

No not really. If this were electricity - you may have 200 amp service in your home but you're not going to draw 200 amps continuously, even during prime time. Even if the electricity could be generated the grid cannot support that.

Your comparing a scarce resource to one that is not at all scarce.

Funny, my gigabit router at home doesn't have a meter on it.


koolkid1563
Premium,MVM
join:2005-11-06
Powell, WY

said by DataRiker:

Funny, my gigabit router at home doesn't have a meter on it.

Shhhh! Be careful with that one or it just might

cubguy

join:2010-07-09
Greenwood Springs, MS
Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast

reply to DataRiker

said by DataRiker:

said by fAcEtIOUs:

eating up the bandwidth.
[att=2]

Isn't that the point of bandwidth to be used? Hopefully to full capacity.

Here is some technicality to prove availability does not constitute "need to use"

When you pick up your phone on a POTS you get a dialtone. Most people take this for granted because its instantaneous, but do not realize that there are only a certain number of them available (channels) at any time. You see the breakdown of this system often during emergencies when large amounts of people attempt to access the telephone network at once. Its better now because of upstream algorithms can allocate additional bandwidth to handle the voice traffic, but think about New York and 9/11. It mostly affected the cellular network and was exacerbated by the loss of a primary cellular tower and the damage to the Verizon switch located across the street from WTC, but many people who just had POTS most likely picked up their phone to find there was no dial tone. They would assume damage to the line, but not always the case.

In a perfect world, companies would over-allocate the number available slots/channels for an area, but just like the airlines, they oversell the slots/seats with the calculation that not everyone will show/use the resources at once.

Friday, 01-Jun 22:18:29 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics