dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
13
share rss forum feed


Noah Vail
Son made my Avatar
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Bright House
reply to hottboiinnc

Re: New law only guarantees voters get an OK BEFORE $ spent

said by hottboiinnc:

the benefits do NOT out way the costs of the build. Nor does EVERY citizen think its a benefit NOR will EVERY citizen paying use the network. Again why should 90year old grandparents have to pay for the network? They'll never use it; but yet they'll be required to pay for that network to get built and especially if it goes belly up. The network will NEVER turn a profit nor will it ever be able to keep up with user demand.

Which is why an informed citizenry should be given the opportunity to vote and reject/accept the project.

Why does the idea of an informed electorate choosing this future for themselves bother you?

NV
--
Any Goal that is Driven by Animosity, is Empowered through Deceit.


FFH5
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Tavistock NJ
kudos:5

1 edit
said by Noah Vail:

Which is why an informed citizenry should be given the opportunity to vote and reject/accept the project.

Why does the idea of an informed electorate choosing this future for themselves bother you?

Before this law was passed, the citizenry, informed or otherwise, had no say in the decision of starting a municipal broadband project. That decision was made by the local elected pol, or more likely the local party boss, looking to find jobs for his family and political supporters in a municipal broadband utility. At least with the new law the voters get to actually vote on whether a municipal broadband system is wanted or not.
--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88


Noah Vail
Son made my Avatar
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Bright House

1 recommendation

said by FFH5:

Before this law was passed, the citizenry, informed or otherwise, had no say in the decision of starting a municipal broadband project. That decision was made by the local elected pol, or more likely the local party boss, looking to find jobs for his family and political supporters in a municipal broadband utility. At least with the new law the voters get to actually vote on whether a municipal broadband system is wanted or not.

In March 10, 1992, a ballot initiative was passed in the City of Morganton North Carolina; by a vote of 2777 to 1169.

It was organized in response to the abysmal service provided by TCI and directed the City to build the local cable system that is presently delivering their broadband.

A link to a site that tells of a NC Muni broadband project,
that was deployed over the objections of much/most of it's residents
would be helpful.

NV
--
Any Goal that is Driven by Animosity, is Empowered through Deceit.

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO
reply to FFH5
So when those local elected pols make the decisions you agree with it is OK that only those local elected pols make those decisions. But when it is something against you, you feel all citizens should have to decide that?

Lets make fair, fair. Put the just enacted law on the ballet and see if NC supports it in order for it to go into effect. If they approve it, then fine. If they don't, then it is removed from the books.