 | reply to openbox9
Re: core reasons said by openbox9:Wow, PDOOMA much?
The bottom line most definitely isn't mythical. Is yours? Also, with a 1000% ROI in a matter of weeks, it's unfathomable as to why these silly ISPs haven't built the infrastructure yet  Wow, really? What kind of world are you living in where the monetary drop in the pond it'd take to get rural communities going would at all hurt companies worth millions, perhaps billions?
Excuse me for not playing the woe is the telco card. I have personal experience in trying to get a WISP going and it was a nightmare of redtape and local telco and cable blockading everything.
Prices from other markets and the fact America is largely a duopoly of cable and DSL/fiber, along with TV price hikes, well. They'd more than make up that investment in giving a scattering of people access to speeds above 3MB. |
|
 openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 1 edit | How exactly do you define a "monetary drop in the pond"? Apparently the government has wasted billions on encouraging buildouts with little to show. Granted, private industry could likely do it more efficiently, but it's not a "drop in the bucket".
I'm sure you realize the significant differences of wireless providers versus wireline, so I'm not sure your point there except to suggest that starting a business is challenging.
My point is that a lot of people appear disillusioned as to how much money infrastructure projects can cost. |
|
 | It isn't the government's fault that the corporations evaporated the funds they were given.
Private industry? Don't make me laugh. If it were up to them, we wouldn't even have 768K download speeds.
Why do you feel the government is to blame and not the people wasting the money they were given? You don't want the government telling them how to spend taxpayer money, yet it's the government's fault they wasted it? |
|
 openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | What? It's not the government's fault that regulators failed in their responsibilities? It's not the governments fault for continuing to drop money left and right with no accountability or return on investment? Accountability, accountability, accountability. |
|
|
|
 | Then where's the accountability of the corporations who wasted the money? |
|
 openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Ask your elected officials and their appointed regulators. |
|
 rradina join:2000-08-08 Chesterfield, MO | reply to slynerve Let's say you are a subdivision trustee responsible for making sure the common grounds in the subdivision are mowed. You contract with a neighborhood kid. He sends bills, which you regularly approve for payment, but he never mows anything. In fact you learn that he has subcontracted the job and they mowed once and then never again because the kid didn't pay them. The kid keeps sending bills and you keep approving them for payment.
Who do the subdivision members hold accountable for wasted funds and overgrown common grounds? |
|
 public join:2002-01-19 Santa Clara, CA | reply to slynerve said by slynerve:said by openbox9:Wow, PDOOMA much?
The bottom line most definitely isn't mythical. Is yours? Also, with a 1000% ROI in a matter of weeks, it's unfathomable as to why these silly ISPs haven't built the infrastructure yet  Wow, really? What kind of world are you living in where the monetary drop in the pond it'd take to get rural communities going would at all hurt companies worth millions, perhaps billions? Excuse me for not playing the woe is the telco card. I have personal experience in trying to get a WISP going and it was a nightmare of redtape and local telco and cable blockading everything. Prices from other markets and the fact America is largely a duopoly of cable and DSL/fiber, along with TV price hikes, well. They'd more than make up that investment in giving a scattering of people access to speeds above 3MB. In Australia the cost on national fiber to over 90% citizens has been put at $40billion, or about the cost of 20 weeks of Iraq war. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_B···_Network
Meanwhile here anti technology ATT offers dialup. Even police gangs are unhappy.
Some Arizona Department of Public Safety computers remain on dial-up:
"The dial-up internet connection is extremely slow and inconsistent, .06 megabits per second. There are often two officers sharing this slow connection, which makes for even slower speeds and less consistent service. Some of the videos on the intranet and training sites are five, ten or even fifty megabytes, which means it often takes from four to twenty hours to download some of the videos and files necessary for training or other work related items"
|
|
 | reply to slynerve " I have personal experience in trying to get a WISP going and it was a nightmare of redtape and local telco and cable blockading everything."
You are doing something wrong considering how many WISPs exist today to serve rurual America. |
|
 | I didn't do anything wrong. I was blocked by foot stamping and tantrums because I wanted to lay fiber to the sites where I intended to build towers. |
|
 | Are you / were you a CLEC? |
|