brad
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON | IPv6 enabled DSLR Could the site admins look into IPv6 enabling the site? |
|
 lilhurricaneSo mote it bePremium,Mod
join:2003-01-11
Purple Zone
kudos:54 | Ref only: »IPv6 enabled, when?
..posted a year ago this month  |
|
 removedPremium,VIP
join:2002-02-08
Houston, TX
kudos:37 | reply to brad
*object* |
|
 aefstoggaflmOpen Source FanPremium
join:2002-03-04
Bethlehem, PA
kudos:2
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| * Sign * on if the site changes to Dual Stack.
Otherwise, *object* because not everyone has IPv6. 
Just wondering...
Why do you object to the idea?
Thanks.
--
Please use the "yellow (IM) envelope" to contact me and please leave the URL intact. |
|
 ironwalker World RenownedPremium,MVM
join:2001-08-31
Keansburg, NJ | reply to brad
He always rejects, I think he has an auto script that replys with "object", just ignore him. |
|
brad
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON | reply to brad
Well it would be nice to have a serious discussion with the site admin(s) about this subject matter. Their hosting provider NAC has a well connected network with 3 IPv6 transit providers (Telia, TInet, NLayer) and some peering (Hurricane, etc.). As far as I am aware they've been offering IPv6 service to co-lo/dedicated customers for awhile now. It looks like the site is utilizing nginx for the web server and some Linux-based OS. So at this point there should be no serious obstacles to offering IPv6 access to DSLR (meaning AAAA records for (www.)dslreports.com)... |
|
removedPremium,VIP
join:2002-02-08
Houston, TX
kudos:37 | reply to ironwalker
said by ironwalker:He always rejects, I think he has an auto script that replys with "object", just ignore him.
Your statement is not accurate. I've *signed* to dozens of requests over the years.
--
irc.removed.us - #dslr |
|
 C_Kill The SocialistsPremium
join:2001-03-19
kudos:3 | reply to brad
*sign* |
|
aefstoggaflmOpen Source FanPremium
join:2002-03-04
Bethlehem, PA
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to brad
said by brad:Well it would be nice to have a serious discussion with the site admin(s) about this subject matter. Their hosting provider NAC has a well connected network with 3 IPv6 transit providers (Telia, TInet, NLayer) and some peering (Hurricane, etc.). As far as I am aware they've been offering IPv6 service to co-lo/dedicated customers for awhile now. It looks like the site is utilizing nginx for the web server and some Linux-based OS. So at this point there should be no serious obstacles to offering IPv6 access to DSLR (meaning AAAA records for (www.)dslreports.com)...
Taps on justin  , fatness , nil , Karl Bode , and on cabana
--
Please use the "yellow (IM) envelope" to contact me and please leave the URL intact. |
|
 nilJava Geek
join:2000-11-27
kudos:1 | That's really a query for justin . |
|
| reply to brad
*OBJECT*, ipv4 will be around for years, no need for ipv6 |
|
 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:7 | said by silentlooker:*OBJECT*, ipv4 will be around for years, no need for ipv6
It's thinking like this that got us into the mess in the first place. |
|
|
|
aefstoggaflmOpen Source FanPremium
join:2002-03-04
Bethlehem, PA
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| said by cdru:said by silentlooker:*OBJECT*, ipv4 will be around for years, no need for ipv6
It's thinking like this that got us into the mess in the first place. So, you agree with that poster OR do you disagree?
Thanks.
--
Please use the "yellow (IM) envelope" to contact me and please leave the URL intact. |
|
cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:7 | said by aefstoggaflm:said by cdru:said by silentlooker:*OBJECT*, ipv4 will be around for years, no need for ipv6
It's thinking like this that got us into the mess in the first place. So, you agree with that poster OR do you disagree? Thanks. I agree that IPv4 will be around for years. I disagree that there is no need for IPv6. There have been numerous articles about how slow the adoption for IPv6 has been. You'd think a site that caters to broadband topics might be one of the earlier adopters if for no other reason than saying "Hey, we're supporting IPv6. Why aren't you?"
So I'll *sign* in support of the original request to IPv6 enable the site. |
|
aefstoggaflmOpen Source FanPremium
join:2002-03-04
Bethlehem, PA
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| said by cdru:I agree that IPv4 will be around for years. I disagree that there is no need for IPv6. There have been numerous articles about how slow the adoption for IPv6 has been. You'd think a site that caters to broadband topics might be one of the earlier adopters if for no other reason than saying "Hey, we're supporting IPv6. Why aren't you?"
So I'll *sign* in support of the original request to IPv6 enable the site.
Ok, that makes sence. 
--
Please use the "yellow (IM) envelope" to contact me and please leave the URL intact. |
|
brad
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON | reply to silentlooker
said by silentlooker:*OBJECT*, ipv4 will be around for years, no need for ipv6
Completely flawed logic, but expected. |
|
 whfsdudePremium
join:2003-04-05
Washington, DC
 ·T-Mobile US
| reply to silentlooker
said by silentlooker:*OBJECT*, ipv4 will be around for years, no need for ipv6
IPv4 will be around for years. In fact, it's not going anywhere. ISPs will be deploying carrier grade NAT (NAT444) where users sit behind multiple layers of NAT and are given private addresses.
When 1,000 people are sharing an IP address, it's going to be a pretty poor experience.
Eg. 1 user launches a brute force against a login on dslreports.com. What does dslreports.com do, do they ban the IP and block 999 other users from accessing the site?
Of course NAT444 users will likely have IPv6 so you could simply ban that IP knowing that most of those users will be going over IPv6. That's assuming dslreports.com has IPv6 |
|
 Matt3All noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to brad
*sign*
NAC has IPv6 peering to the following major locations:
Equinix Ashburn
NYIIX
LINX (Europe - Brocade and Extreme)
Isn't this a technology site? |
|
whfsdudePremium
join:2003-04-05
Washington, DC | reply to brad
At least give us something. Even if it's a load balancer (or apache proxy) and a different subdomain ipv6.dslreports.com. (eg. ipv6.cnn.com) |
|
 nightshade74Yet another genxerPremium
join:2004-11-06
Prattville, AL | reply to brad
*sign* |
|
