<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Charge us?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Charge-us-26061859</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:21:43 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:21:43 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Charge us?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Charge-us-26062383</link>
<description><![CDATA[cork1958 posted : Somebody needs to "educate" the RIAA and MPAA. What century are those idiots still living in anyway?<br><small>--<br>The Firefox alternative.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/" >www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Charge-us-26062383</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:09:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Charge us?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Charge-us-26061859</link>
<description><![CDATA[TheRogueX posted : The ISPs should bill the RIAA and MPAA for any charges incurred in setting up and maintaining these new systems.  They're the ones demanding the new plan, after all, so they should have to pay for it.<br><br>Only logical, right?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Charge-us-26061859</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:44:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
