 | reply to MaynardKrebs
Re: Lawful Access articles - collection Calling this 'lawful access' is a real piece of Orwellian doubethink.
It is anything but.
As I posted further up this thread the Canadian Charter of Rights is superior to this nonsense and renders it completely null and void before its even debated.
Don't consent, notify your ISP, the local government and the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police that you do not consent to any search or seizure of your personal communication without your prior written and fully notarized consent. Throw in a copy of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in there, and a copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for good measure.
Then when it does happen down the road, cos they will all just go ahead and do it anyway, you have cured notices in place and can sue both your ISP and the government. |
|
 elwoodbluesElwood BluesPremium join:2006-08-30 HarperLand Reviews:
·Cybersurf Intern..
| said by tyrmorr:Calling this 'lawful access' is a real piece of Orwellian doubethink.
It is anything but.
As I posted further up this thread the Canadian Charter of Rights is superior to this nonsense and renders it completely null and void before its even debated.
You need to be charged and convicted, then make your way through the various court systems before making a charter challenge to the SCC. That could take years. -- All Hail Harper, the Wannabe King of Canada |
|
 | If they impinge upon your rights you don't have to go through all that.
There is far easier remedy if you have yourself prepared, you just need to seek it.
If you can show damage, you can can sue. An unlawful search is damage. If you have given these people prior notice, that's just gravy. |
|
|
|