<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Where is At&#x26;t?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Where-is-Att-26275254</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:22:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:22:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Where is At&#x26;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-is-Att-26276956</link>
<description><![CDATA[spewak posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1792675" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1792675');">en103</a>:</said><p>They're not grabbing the top 5% of all users, but taking an 'average' of all users.<br><br> </p></div>I didn't think so:<br><a rel=nofollow HREF="http://www.speedtest.net" > [att=1] </A><br><small>--<br>The weekend is here, grab a can of beer!<br></small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/26276956?c=1683307&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyNjI3NTI1NC54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="54643 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=135 SRC="/r0/download/1683307~576e65c7d5ddc235c144c5910da22095/18322_166"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-is-Att-26276956</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:16:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Where is At&#x26;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-is-Att-26275752</link>
<description><![CDATA[con100 posted : I used to have Uverse and it was slow. Got slower speeds then what I paid for. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-is-Att-26275752</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:40:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Where is At&#x26;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-is-Att-26275387</link>
<description><![CDATA[en103 posted : They're not grabbing the top 5% of all users, but taking an 'average' of all users.<br>AT&T's Uverse internet starts out with 3Mbps/1Mbps and charges extra.  If they add in the ADSL users, many never make it past 3Mbps (2.4Mbps after ATM overhead).<br><br>TWC (and most cable providers) first bundle in +10Mbps/1Mbps (they'll charge more for a 1.5Mbps if you wanted to downgrade in a bundle!), 'then' they add on 'Boost' to fluff the numbers with a 20-30Mbps download rate for the first 10-20 seconds.<br><br>Eg.  My '10/1Mbps package'<br><a rel=nofollow HREF="http://www.speedtest.net" > <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/1463281252.png"> </A><br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by pcmag :</SMALL><HR>Who scored the lowest? Folks in Alabama, South Carolina and Mississippi appear to stumble thanks to AT&T South (formerly Bellsouth). All had an index of well below 5.0 (Alabama's AT&T speed is the lowest on the chart, with an index of 2.56.). The District of Columbia comes close, with Verizon getting an index score of 3.19 (despite the fact that FiOS is available in D.C.).<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-is-Att-26275387</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:43:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Where is At&#x26;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Where-is-Att-26275254</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : Verse gets decent speeds... are they seriously slower then earthlink?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Where-is-Att-26275254</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:05:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
