| |
IPKall omits 1 / +1 (for NANP) Caller ID prefixIs there a way to make IPKall stop omitting the prefix of "1" (or, better yet, "+1") on the Caller ID of incoming phone calls? Such omission gets really confusing very fast, especially if you are using services from multiple providers and frequently receive international and out-of-state calls.
Anyone from IPKall here? |
|
| |
Sorry, I can't help you, other than to confirm that I've observed the same incorrect behavior. However, I can't help but laugh, because I was about to recommend IPKall as a possible workaround for XCOM's complaint about Callcentric adding the 1 » [General] CallCentric Invalid NANP CID |
|
 XCOMdigitalnUll
Premium Member
join:2002-06-10
Spring, TX
MikroTik CRS125-24G-1S-RM
|
XCOM
Premium Member
2011-Nov-2 10:15 pm
lol @ Stewart  OP: Welcome to my world  At least with my experience with CC there is nothing that the carrier can do. Good Luck |
|
| |
to ConstantineM
said by ConstantineM:Is there a way to make IPKall stop omitting the prefix of "1" (or, better yet, "+1") on the Caller ID of incoming phone calls? Such omission gets really confusing very fast, especially if you are using services from multiple providers and frequently receive international and out-of-state calls.
Funny, I was just saying that earlier today! One solution would be to switch to CallCentric. In several years have not seen any evidence (on this forum) that they have any corporeal existence on this earth. There is a rather different IPKall forum but (although I wish you good luck) I would not count on anything. » forum.voxilla.com/ipkall ··· t-forum/ |
|
| |
to ConstantineM
i wonder if IPKall actually strips away the '+1 or 1' or if there is a specific termination provider that is commonly used for that rate center that is sending the calls without the '+1 or 1'
could this somehow affect whether a call is billed as interstate or intrastate? |
|
maziloFrom Mazilo
Premium Member
join:2002-05-30
Lilburn, GA |
to ConstantineM
said by ConstantineM:Is there a way to make IPKall stop omitting the prefix of "1" (or, better yet, "+1") on the Caller ID of incoming phone calls? I believe this can be circumvented with the use of a PBX System to strip off the leading +1 on an incoming CID. Such omission gets really confusing very fast, especially if you are using services from multiple providers and frequently receive international and out-of-state calls. I am not sure if I agree with you on this. I have used so many different VoSPs services from around the world. Some has +44 (UK), etc., and I don't get confused, but rather appreciate such an addition. |
|
dcm
join:2008-09-12
Pennsylvania |
to ConstantineM
I personally like that calls coming from IPKall don't have the "1".
This makes it easy for me to know whether I am paying for the incoming call or not.
IPKall (no "1") = Free
CC DID (has "1") = 1.5cpm |
|
| |
to ConstantineM
my ipkall(area code 425) forwarded to CC and showed on Vtech DS3111-2 is unknown then xxx-xxx-xxxx no prefix 1 ,but on panasonic KXTC1743B is out of state and 1-xxx-xxx-xxxx, very funny,and all calls are free of charge since forwarded SIP call not forwarded a number,thanks! |
|
| |
to ConstantineM
My Ipkall did's I've used off and on never appended +1 or 1 to the caller id number. |
|
| |
said by jason_m:My Ipkall did's I've used off and on never appended +1 or 1 to the caller id number.
I know. It sucks. So, I'm not alone. Welcome to the club. :-p |
|
OmagicQPosting in a thread near you
join:2003-10-23
Bakersfield, CA |
to dcm
said by dcm:I personally like that calls coming from IPKall don't have the "1".
This makes it easy for me to know whether I am paying for the incoming call or not.
IPKall (no "1") = Free
CC DID (has "1") = 1.5cpm
+1 This is also how I can tell a call from Voip.ms did vs Voipo did. |
|
| |
said by OmagicQ:+1 This is also how I can tell a call from Voip.ms did vs Voipo did. Funny how we use +1 to indicate our agreement with a disagreement about +1 |
|
|
 DavesnothereChange is NOT Necessarily Progress
Premium Member
join:2009-06-15
Canada |
said by Stewart:Funny how we use +1 to indicate our agreement with a disagreement about +1
. +1 to your observation |
|
