<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;analogs poor quality&#x27; in forum &#x27;Comcast Cable TV&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/analogs-poor-quality-26577992</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:54:05 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:54:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: analogs poor quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-quality-26583545</link>
<description><![CDATA[DrDrew posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/107980" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=107980');">DaveDude</a>:</said><p>So digits can do well on a "weak" signal? Cause only the analogs are snowy all others fine. <br> </p></div>Most digital boxes can work well with the digital channel signal between -15dBmV and +15 dBmV (as long as SNR is good), just like a cable modem. That's a 30 dB dynamic range.<br><br>Many TV's start looking snowy below 0 dBmV and some start having tuner problems above +10 dBmV. That's a 10 dB dynamic range.<br><small>--<br>If it's important, back it up... twice. <A HREF="http://stopthecap.com/2010/12/27/hawaiian-telcom-phone-lines-and-dsl-broadband-go-dead-for-days-because-it-rained/">Even 99.999% availability isn't enough sometimes.</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-quality-26583545</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:33:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: analogs poor quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-quality-26583516</link>
<description><![CDATA[andyross posted : Digital will look good with a weak signal, until it gets too weak. Then it will start to pixelate or drop out completely. It's more or less a sharp cliff, whereas analog will just get snowier and snowier.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-quality-26583516</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:25:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: analogs poor quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-quality-26583506</link>
<description><![CDATA[DaveDude posted : So digits can do well on a "weak" signal? Cause only the analogs are snowy all others fine. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-quality-26583506</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:22:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: analogs poor quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-quality-26578369</link>
<description><![CDATA[andyross posted : If they are showing snow, then your signal is weak. Going digital shouldn't affect the analog quality. Maybe some wiring changes, either in your house or your area, caused the signal reduction.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-quality-26578369</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:27:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: analogs poor qualiry</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-qualiry-26578051</link>
<description><![CDATA[Joe12345678 posted : they are likely going away soon anyways.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-analogs-poor-qualiry-26578051</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:58:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>analogs poor quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/analogs-poor-quality-26577992</link>
<description><![CDATA[DaveDude posted : How come comcast analog channels are so bad? Before they went all digital analogs were in good shape. Now there are always snowy. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/analogs-poor-quality-26577992</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:42:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
