 bigsy join:2001-07-18 UK kudos:1 | reply to john51
Re: [Config] Cisco 1921 and HWIC-1VDSL Good to hear.
Would you post the output of 'sh contr vd 0/0/0' as I'd like to see what's reported? |
|
|
|
 | Here you go:
Controller VDSL 0/0/0 is UP
Daemon Status: Up
XTU-R (DS) XTU-C (US) Chip Vendor ID: 'BDCM' 'BDCM' Chip Vendor Specific: 0x0000 0xA1B7 Chip Vendor Country: 0xB500 0xB500 Modem Vendor ID: 'CSCO' 'BDCM' Modem Vendor Specific: 0x4602 0xA1B7 Modem Vendor Country: 0xB500 0xB500 Serial Number Near: FOC151311CY 1921/K9 15.0(1)M Serial Number Far: Modem Version Near: 15.0(1)M Modem Version Far: 0xa1b7
Modem Status: TC Sync (Showtime!) DSL Config Mode: AUTO Trained Mode: G.993.2 (VDSL2) TC Mode: PTM DELT configuration: disabled DELT state: not running Trellis: ON ON Line Attenuation: 0.0 dB 0.0 dB Signal Attenuation: 0.0 dB 0.0 dB Noise Margin: 23.3 dB 23.4 dB Attainable Rate: 109436 kbits/s 32426 kbits/s Actual Power: 12.3 dBm -12.6 dBm Per Band Status: D1 D2 D3 U0 U1 U2 U3 Line Attenuation(dB): 1.9 4.8 12.2 0.1 5.2 7.4 N/A Signal Attenuation(dB): 1.9 4.8 12.2 0.0 N/A 6.3 N/A Noise Margin(dB): 23.4 23.3 23.3 23.3 N/A 23.4 N/A Total FECS: 0 0 Total ES: 0 0 Total SES: 0 0 Total LOSS: 0 0 Total UAS: 0 0 Total LPRS: 0 0 Total LOFS: 0 0 Total LOLS: 0 0
Full inits: 0 Failed full inits: 0 Short inits: 0 Failed short inits: 0
Firmware Source File Name (version) -------- ------ ------------------- VDSL embedded VDSL_LINUX_DEV_01212008 (1)
Modem FW Version: 090929_1033-4.02L.01.AvC011b.d21j1 Modem PHY Version: AvC011b.d21j1
DS Channel1 DS Channel0 US Channel1 US Channel0 Speed (kbps): 0 39998 0 10000 Reed-Solomon EC: 0 0 0 0 CRC Errors: 0 0 0 0 Header Errors: 0 0 0 0 Interleave (ms): 0 0 0 0 Actual INP: 0 0 0 0
Training Log : Stopped Training Log Filename : flash:vdsllog.bin
Cisco1#
Thanks to all for the help thus far!  |
|
 | Just had a problem logging onto Internet banking and ip's webpage... added a line ip tcp adjust-mss 1350 to g0/0 (lan facing)
I saw this on another config, by the way.
Now faster than old provider's hardware 31.5 up, 6.3 down.
 |
|
 | reply to john51 Faster's always good, how fast were you getting with the ISP supplied gear, and how stable is the connection? Nothing like running multiple streams of traffic for several hours on end and seeing if anything chokes or not 
Regards |
|
 | I spoke too soon!!!  I have now got an apparent dns resolution problem, i.e. https are fine, but domain names won't open in I.E 8 with Bitdefender AV, enabled or no..
I have read up a little on adjust-mss, and ip mtu and tried various settings, including increasing mtu on the lan nic, to no avil.
Is it possible that I need a vlan both sides of the router?
Do I possibly need a static route to lan facing g0/0?
regards |
|
 | reply to john51 said by john51:I have now got an apparent dns resolution problem, i.e. https are fine, but domain names won't open in I.E 8 with Bitdefender AV, enabled or no.. Can you clarify this problem further? Is it certain webpages (both http and https) intermittently not displaying, or no http pages at all?
Intermittent webpage problems + a DSL connection usually is an MTU problem. For chuckles, from your PC ping a website address with the "-l 1500" and "-f" options. Adjust the -l size up and down as needed to rule this out.
Regards |
|
 | I'll reply fully soon re the mtu, but also a problem is that a Netgear WG302 is not working properly with the cisco setup. (via Netgear Gig switch) It recieves an address via dhcp, but is not reachable by wireless devices for data, although it can be logged onto, I think I need to try it with a fixed ip when I get a minute. I will try to explain the browser problem again. It appears to be only with Google.uk. The anti-virus programme (bitdefender) annotates sites as safe, but, suggested sites fromr a google search will not open if selected from ordinary text, but if selected from the ticked area, ie http, or https addresses they will open. This does not apply to Amazon ads regardless of how they appear, or suggested sites via Yahoo search engine which also work. As you can see, I have large gaps in my knowledge!
No rush, guys, I've got a lot to do on my site.
Happy New Year everyone!!  |
|
 TomS_Git-r-donePremium,MVM join:2002-07-19 Ireland kudos:1 | reply to john51 I should imagine you can use an MSS of 1452. With PPPoE you typically end up with a useable MTU of 1492, as 8 additional bytes are required for PPPoE headers. Then, adjusting for 40 bytes of IP headers, you should be able to run 1452 bytes of payload through.
The lower you drop your MSS, the more packets your data has to be broken up into, which could have performance "implications". |
|
 | reply to john51 Add the following global command...ip tcp path-mtu-discovery
Remove the MTU & all the mss statements & the 'ip unreachables' on the Dialer. Then find your MTU with the ping -f command. Put the new MTU on your Dialer interface. Add the MSS statement after subtracting 48 from the MTU you found.
Why does the WAN interface have a .101 sub-interface? |
|
 cramer join:2007-04-10 Raleigh, NC kudos:5 | Read the entire thread... a VLAN tag is required on the VDSL interface. |
|
 | I'll be able to report a bit more soon, and I have tried to date all that has been suggested, but it's still only Google searches that are affected.I see no mention of Google in the commands that appeared after the security audit, but plenty of Yahoo which works as a search engine. Maybe I should strip out all the security lock-down and try it again? |
|
 Reviews:
·Nexicom
| reply to john51 Not that it's overly useful but:
Remove your default route and put this under your dialer:
ppp ipcp route default
FWIW, I'm using the same router with VDSL2 as well, but I'm not using an HWIC (supplied modem).
I have two VLAN's setup, a few IPsec tunnels....etc, so my config is a bit more complex than yours. |
|
 | Hi, I finally got there, but had to use the classic firewall. But: I tried all combinations of MTU/MSS settings to start with, and tried all the suggestions on those from you folks, but still google search result links refused to open, no other search engines were affected.
I have managed 37 up and 8.5 down bandwidth, but speedtest isn't working well at the moment (might be the firewall!!)
I could probably edit the zone firewall if I knew what I was doing!
Here's the bones of the current config:
nterface Null0 no ip unreachables ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description $ETH-LAN$$FW_INSIDE$ ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 100 in no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ip flow ingress ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 duplex auto speed auto no mop enabled ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ip flow ingress ip virtual-reassembly ip tcp adjust-mss 1412 duplex auto speed auto no mop enabled ! no routing dynamic ! interface Ethernet0/0/0 no ip address no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ip flow ingress no mop enabled ! ! interface Ethernet0/0/0.101 encapsulation dot1Q 101 no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ip flow ingress ip virtual-reassembly pppoe enable group global pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 ! interface Dialer1 description $FW_OUTSIDE$ ip address negotiated ip access-group 101 in no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ip mtu 1492 ip flow ingress ip nat outside ip inspect CCP_MEDIUM out ip virtual-reassembly encapsulation ppp ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp chap hostname bthomehub@btbroadband.com ppp chap password 7 00161C13105E ppp pap sent-username bthomehub@btbroadband.com password 7 010109114F0E ppp ipcp dns request accept ppp ipcp route default ppp ipcp address accept no cdp enable ! service-policy input sdmappfwp2p_CCP_MEDIUM service-policy output sdmappfwp2p_CCP_MEDIUM ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ip http server ip http access-class 2 no ip http secure-server ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer1 overload ! logging trap debugging access-list 1 permit any access-list 2 remark HTTP Access-class list access-list 2 remark CCP_ACL Category=1 access-list 2 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 2 deny any access-list 100 remark auto generated by CCP firewall configuration access-list 100 remark CCP_ACL Category=1 access-list 100 deny ip host 255.255.255.255 any access-list 100 deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any access-list 100 permit ip any any access-list 101 remark auto generated by CCP firewall configuration access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=1 access-list 101 permit udp host 194.72.9.38 eq domain any access-list 101 permit udp host 62.6.40.178 eq domain any access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo-reply access-list 101 permit icmp any any time-exceeded access-list 101 permit icmp any any unreachable access-list 101 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip host 255.255.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any access-list 101 deny ip any any log ! no cdp run
! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! line con 0 login authentication local_authen transport output telnet line aux 0 login authentication local_authen transport output telnet line vty 0 4 password 7 03035A090A0A70 authorization exec local_author login authentication local_authen transport input telnet ssh ! scheduler allocate 20000 1000 end
Thanks all, for your help.
 |
|
 | reply to john51 Can you share the lines of config that have "ip inspect" in them. I can take a quick boo at it. For ZBFW, I'd check the FAQ, or some of the more experienced members of the board may be able to help.
Regards |
|
 | said by HELLFIRE:Can you share the lines of config that have "ip inspect" in them. I can take a quick boo at it. For ZBFW, I'd check the FAQ, or some of the more experienced members of the board may be able to help.
Regards Here you go: no ip dhcp conflict logging ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.254 ! ip dhcp pool 0 import all network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 192.168.1.254 dns-server 62.6.40.178 194.72.9.38 ! ! no ip bootp server ip name-server 62.6.40.178 ip name-server 194.72.9.38 ip inspect log drop-pkt ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM appfw CCP_MEDIUM ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM cuseeme ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM dns ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM h323 ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM sip ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM https ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM icmp ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM imap reset ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM netshow ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM rcmd ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM realaudio ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM rtsp ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM esmtp ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM sqlnet ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM streamworks ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM tftp ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM tcp ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM udp ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM vdolive ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM pop3 secure-login ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM ftps ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM kermit ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM uucp ip inspect name CCP_MEDIUM nfs ! Thanks for your interest. Can anybody think of any reason why email attachments (mediaplayer) from a camera of about 30 megs would not send? I don't think they were a problem before.
Regards. |
|
 | reply to john51 I'd probably use this config as a guide for classic firewall config.
I've also customized my config options as follows
ip inspect log drop-pkt
ip inspect udp idle-time 15
ip inspect hashtable-size 8192
ip inspect dns-timeout 2
ip inspect tcp idle-time 1800
ip inspect tcp finwait-time 1
ip inspect tcp synwait-time 15
ip inspect tcp block-non-session
ip inspect tcp max-incomplete host 25 block-time 120
ip inspect tcp reassembly timeout 2
ip inspect tcp reassembly alarm on
Regards |
|
 | Thanks! I've copied the pdf version as well as yours. Ignore the bit about the videos and email, I think they are just to big.
Regards, |
|
 TomS_Git-r-donePremium,MVM join:2002-07-19 Ireland kudos:1 | reply to john51 I would try removing the firewall config and ACL from your dialer and LAN interfaces and see what happens - first step when troubleshooting these kinds of issues. And you dont really need them, its just adding complexity where it isnt necessary.
Once you remove them, do your connectivity and speed tests again, and compare the results. Then enable one, and re-do your tests and compare. Lather, rinse, repeat, until you work out which one is causing the issues. Then work on working out why and how to fix it. |
|
 skjWelcome to the far side of realityPremium,Mod join:2002-04-04 Gone South | (topic move) [Config] Cisco 1921 and HWIC-1VDSLModerator Action The post that was here (and all 1 followups to it), has been moved to a new topic .. »[Config] Setup Cisco 877 to work with Bt Infinity |
|