dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
3
share rss forum feed
« class action suit
This is a sub-selection from Hum...


PapaMidnight

join:2009-01-13
Baltimore, MD
reply to battleop

Re: Hum...

I'm in shock. A company admits they no longer need throttling because they've made investments?

Other companies could learn from this....


NefCanuck

join:2007-06-26
Mississauga, ON
Reviews:
·voip.ms

said by PapaMidnight:

I'm in shock. A company admits they no longer need throttling because they've made investments?

Other companies could learn from this....

The problem with this shell game (and that's all it is) is that we'll never see any proof of if Bell has actually spent a single dime dealing with "network congestion" versus spending the monies on things like ads trying to convince us that Bell is better than the other large incumbent.

NefCanuck


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000

I would say that they are doing away with caps is some sort of proof that have spent a few dimes.



andyb
Premium
join:2003-05-29
SW Ontario
kudos:1

They are not removing caps,just throttling



ChucksTruck

@teksavvy.com

Bell also raised the overuse fee effective January 2012 to 80 dollars maximum from 60. That also may have had something to do with getting rid of throttling.