| reply to battleop
Re: Hum... I'm in shock. A company admits they no longer need throttling because they've made investments?
Other companies could learn from this.... |
|
Reviews:
 ·voip.ms
| said by PapaMidnight:I'm in shock. A company admits they no longer need throttling because they've made investments?
Other companies could learn from this....
The problem with this shell game (and that's all it is) is that we'll never see any proof of if Bell has actually spent a single dime dealing with "network congestion" versus spending the monies on things like ads trying to convince us that Bell is better than the other large incumbent.
NefCanuck |
|
| I would say that they are doing away with caps is some sort of proof that have spent a few dimes. |
|
 andybPremium
join:2003-05-29
SW Ontario
kudos:1 | They are not removing caps,just throttling |
|
|
|
| Bell also raised the overuse fee effective January 2012 to 80 dollars maximum from 60. That also may have had something to do with getting rid of throttling. |
|
