dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
2
share rss forum feed


Naterator

@lifebridgehealth.org
reply to MooJohn

Re: Despite no evidence it is healthy?

Just saying, all those things you mentioned only became widely used in the past 100 years. The past 20 for most of them mentioned.

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
said by Naterator :

Just saying, all those things you mentioned only became widely used in the past 100 years. The past 20 for most of them mentioned.

You are bombarded more by the sun's radiation than any WiFi router.



Naterator

@lifebridgehealth.org
Yes, but not the same or the same level as the radio and radiation of man made devices (hence your device still works as it is not dampened by the naturally occurring radiation and radio waves.)


Gbcue
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
said by Naterator :

Yes, but not the same or the same level as the radio and radiation of man made devices (hence your device still works as it is not dampened by the naturally occurring radiation and radio waves.)

You're right, the sun is even stronger.

That's why when there's a coronal mass ejection, it can mess up cell phones reception, power grids, etc.

I'd stay away from the sun if I were you. I hear it'll even burn you if you stay in its light for too long.
--
My Blog 2.2


Naterator

@lifebridgehealth.org
Yes, but only a short burst of static interference. As the sun does not expose you to the same type of radiation and radio waves. Hence your cell phone may be drowned out. Just like you can boil water with radio waves, there are different types and different amounts. 1 short burst, a lifetime of exposure. Just saying...

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
said by Naterator :

Yes, but only a short burst of static interference. As the sun does not expose you to the same type of radiation and radio waves. Hence your cell phone may be drowned out. Just like you can boil water with radio waves, there are different types and different amounts. 1 short burst, a lifetime of exposure. Just saying...

Try boiling water with a WiFi router. Let me know how that goes for you.



Gbcue
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
reply to Naterator
said by Naterator :

Yes, but only a short burst of static interference. As the sun does not expose you to the same type of radiation and radio waves. Hence your cell phone may be drowned out. Just like you can boil water with radio waves, there are different types and different amounts. 1 short burst, a lifetime of exposure. Just saying...

The sun emits radiation of every frequency (from sub-Radio to Gamma+), at high intensities. Why do you think Wi-Fi and cell towers can only cover a specific area and not forever?
--
My Blog 2.2


Naterator

@lifebridgehealth.org
Not sure what you mean by forever? Infinite, nothing in this universe is infinite. Why do you think Cell Phone and Towers work? Because they emit different then the sun (meaning intensity and level as i may not have been clear or was misspoken in my last post). Just saying.. For a long time people thought smoking was good for you and cured disease.. Red Dye number 9 is so good yumm... That Abestos looks so good it can't be bad.. Just saying long term exposure to things are only measured by time, not theory.


danclan

join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA
What everyone is saying and you keep missing is that yes indeed the sun is in fact more powerful and produces more radiation of stronger intensity that your home router does. Venturing out into the daylight exposes you to far stronger and known cancer causing radiation.

Its called science and its been proven over and over again.

There is no question on this its not theory or hypothesis. The wave lengths in question supplied by your home router and cell phone simply do not harm the human body or any of its tissues.


delusion ftl

@comcast.net
reply to Naterator
Yeah, you're right. In fact almost everything in our society is different than it was 100 years ago.

Are you throwing a fit that your child's classroom may be artificially lit with light bulbs? Have you seen any concrete proof that artificially radiated light does not cause health issues? I do know of several nut jobs (and some people with real issues) who cannot function in artificial light. Are you suggesting that their experience (or delusion) should dictate what is for the betterment of society as a whole because we all may be horribly affected by artificial light?

Facts are facts. Radiation from wifi is a pittance. It's incredibly small. You don't need a study on wifi because the frequency class and power that it is being used for, have been used for decades and decades by other radio devices without issue. Do you squelch in terror when you realize that decades of FM and AM radio waves often at much higher wattages are penetrating your body, home, car, basements and are virtually inescapable in modern society? Do you marvel at the excellent heath exhibited by societies that have little or no radio waves like north Korea, large sections of the middle east and Africa?

I cant stand ignorant talking points like asbestos, red food coloring, and such even being lumped in to the same conversation. It's a travesty of intellect to even bring them up, and an even worse waste of time to point out to those in the dark with reality why. If you dont know, then you'll *never* understand why wifi is a non issue.

markf

join:2008-01-24
Burlington, ON
kudos:1
Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·ELECTRONICBOX
·Execulink Telecom
reply to Naterator
said by Naterator :

Just saying, all those things you mentioned only became widely used in the past 100 years. The past 20 for most of them mentioned.

The average life expectancy of someone 100 years ago would have been about 51 (based on US gov't stats - »aging.senate.gov/crs/aging1.pdf) Today it is pushing 80, almost 30 years more or a 60% increase in life expectancy.

Humanity throughout the ages is evolved to die around 40 - 50 years old. Any extra is a bonus. Now we get diagnosed with cancer and other diseases, in the past you would have just died. Of course cancer rates are going to increase under these conditions. Human cells are not designed to reproduce over and over again for 80 years. We can keep people alive longer than nature otherwise would and this makes them more susceptible to breaking down to the variety of natural and man made dangers out there.

We know for a fact (and there are studies that clearly show) diesel exhaust contains many dangerous pollutants which damage the lungs of people. I don't see anyone advocating a change in the kind of school buses we put kids on. Don't see anyone saying we should ban vehicles because they cause cancer and disease. No one is suggesting we have car police ensuring that vehicles are used for only essential purposes as defined by narrow special interest groups. From ages 1 - 24, the most common cause of death is accidents, with auto accidents being the leading cause. Ban cars to save lives no? To some cars are an unnecessary risk, so everyone should be governed by what they think.

Picking on wifi is like putting a bandaid on a paper cut on your finger when your leg has been chopped off and is bleeding. The evidence we have today suggests that it is safe enough and unless we have clear studies showing that wifi radiation itself is causing increased illness there is no reason to ban it.


Naterator

@lifebridgehealth.org
reply to delusion ftl
smoking, asbestos, red food coloring once were said to be safe.