andyb Premium Member join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario |
to Davesnothere
Re: Globe & Other 2011-44 (UBB) articles |
|
DavesnothereChange is NOT Necessarily Progress Premium Member join:2009-06-15 Canada 2 edits |
Geist's comprehensive multi-linked article says that it's not ALL bad, and he may well have a point there, the way he explained it. It World's was decent too, though shorter, and concentrated more on CNOC's position and its complaints to CRTC. |
|
|
Davesnothere |
Crunchy FROG ? COCKROACH Cluster ?....Something COMPLETELY Different (a short break for some Silliness) : » Comcast Cable Box Comes With Cockroach Surprise [104] comments |
|
Davesnothere |
Re: Globe & Other 2011-44 (UBB) articles Karl from DSLR has published a followup article where he compares the new and the revised service plans which TSI and eBox have just announced, to each other and to those of the incumbent providers such as Bell, and notes that there might be some competition restarting after all, up here in the 'Great White North'. » Consumers Save Canadian Unlimited Broadband [15] comments |
|
Davesnothere |
MacLeans' Articles |
|
Davesnothere |
|
|
|
Davesnothere 4 edits |
CNOC's Part 1 App to CRTC, Re 2011-703&704  Discussion : » 2011-703 FilingsDiscussion : » CNOC's Part 1 Filing on the 703/704 tariffsSubmitted Docs :CNOC's App : » /r0/do ··· 0104.zipCRTC asks for responses to CNOC's App : » /r0/do ··· t%20.pdfJF's response : » /r0/do ··· tion.pdf |
|
Davesnothere 2 edits |
Bell replies to the CRTC about the above app, as requested to do by the CRTC. » /r0/do ··· 0ABR.zipThere are many #####s, few hard facts for us (the public) to read, and few references to the CNOC app doc, from that huge legal department. OTOH, JF's doc had more substance than Bell's, more constructive suggestions about the problems at hand, and of course, no #####s. |
|
Davesnothere 2 edits |
CRTC Page for CNOC Part 1 Application stuff said by jfmezei: »www.crtc.gc.ca/Part1/eng ··· 0063.htm
I think this will start to get populated this Thursday (or appear there on Friday) when the first comments on what immediate actions the CRTC needs to take for Feb 1. |
|
Davesnothere |
Re: CNOC's Part 1 App to CRTC, Re 2011-703&704 Here are some more replies, starting directly at Page 4 of the thread : » CNOC's Part 1 Filing on the 703/704 tariffs |
|
Davesnothere |
I may have missed some, but here are the latest comments, starting directly at Page 8 of the discussion thread : » CNOC's Part 1 Filing on the 703/704 tariffs |
|
andyb Premium Member join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario |
andyb
Premium Member
2012-Feb-2 6:25 pm
Only page 4 if you have your settings to 50 posts a page |
|
DavesnothereChange is NOT Necessarily Progress Premium Member join:2009-06-15 Canada |
said by andyb:Only page 4 if you have your settings to 50 posts a page Good to know that, but will links like mine still begin viewing at the same post as I had planned, if a user has their page length set to non-default ? I DO try to give 'Good Link'. |
|
andyb Premium Member join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario |
andyb
Premium Member
2012-Feb-2 8:18 pm
Starts at a post by Friday 1st for me |
|
DavesnothereChange is NOT Necessarily Progress Premium Member join:2009-06-15 Canada |
....Took me a moment - That's the name of the USER ! @ 2012-01-27 17:04:34 Yes, so that worked out, THIS time. |
|
andyb Premium Member join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario |
andyb
Premium Member
2012-Feb-2 8:44 pm
yea I read it after I posted and said fuck thats confusing,hope he gets it lol |
|