dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
222

David
Premium Member
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL

David

Premium Member

I know this might sound like common sense

but if the GPS signaling seems to be the problem why can't the FCC just find a different set of spectrum for them and essentially tell them

"Hey just move and transmit here!"

I mean seriously, if interference is a problem for any normal WI-FI area where a channel is particularly saturated I just find a different WI-FI transmit channel.

nevermind, I am making sense again... stupid,stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid....

GeekJedi
RF is Good For You
Premium Member
join:2001-06-21
Mukwonago, WI
ARRIS TM1602
Apple AirPort Extreme (2013)
Ooma Telo

GeekJedi

Premium Member

Actually you aren't making sense. Here's why:

Spectrum that would allow LS to do what it wants to do is VERY valuable. LS essentially paid nothing for the spectrum it holds now, since it isn't very valuable.

Therefore what you're proposing is similar to trading a tool shed for a mansion. Not only is that a misuse of public spectrum, it's unfair to the companies that paid significant money to get the proper spectrum.

The real solution here is to allow LS to give the spectrum back and recover whatever money (if any) they bid on it in the first place.

That would make sense.