 Mike2009
join:2009-01-13
Ottawa, ON
kudos:2
 ·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to Tolarian
Re: [DSL] Official 5Megs to 6Megs upgrade thread. I have the same modem. Great choice! |
|
|
|
 HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:12
·TekSavvy DSL
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to sgfan
said by sgfan:I don't know what the al1 profile means but I can assume it means fast path? So, then it's probably a glitch with the remote reporting the wrong setting to the modem then, as HiVolt mentioned earlier.
Actually, I assumed you were on IKNS remote, but you are on broadcom, which has no upstream snr or interleave bug as far as I know.
--
GO LEAFS GO! |
|
HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:12 | Martin, do you know why he syncs at 6015/797? Is this specific to thus type remote maybe? Profile clearly shows 6016/800 as you pasted it.
--
GO LEAFS GO! |
|
HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:12 Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
·TekSavvy Cable
| Actually, I just noticed, he's on the newer VDSL2 Alcatel remote...
"Equipment Type: 7330_REM"
And the profile is ADSL2, not ADSL1, and not ADSL2+. Perhaps some limitation with these remotes not supporting legacy ADSL1, and Bell is setting ADSL2 profiles?
--
GO LEAFS GO! |
|
| reply to TSI Martin
I just emailed them. Didn't even take 30 minutes and I was upgraded. Thank you TSI Tracy  |
|
kovy
join:2009-03-26
kudos:4 | reply to HiVolt
said by HiVolt:Actually, I just noticed, he's on the newer VDSL2 Alcatel remote...
"Equipment Type: 7330_REM"
And the profile is ADSL2, not ADSL1, and not ADSL2+. Perhaps some limitation with these remotes not supporting legacy ADSL1, and Bell is setting ADSL2 profiles?
Nah, I believe it's a simple configuration thing on the slam. |
|
 Talon88 The One
join:2003-08-13
Toronto | reply to TSI Martin
:::
I am now One of the Victim being Downgrade when
Requesting update to 6M....LOL...
TekSavvy Support is still working on my issue with Bell.
Bad Bell even put me on 3M & 512K Interleave....
My Line Stat. of upstream became poor all of sudden
right after the request.
See the Prove.... Fu?K Bell..!!
Any Suggestion...?
:::
--
[=Talon88=] @ Teksavvy DSL (A+)
--
»D-Link FW update "Talon88 Crash Recovery" Step by
--
»[Info] Some Clue about DI-624 Reboot
-- |
|
sgfan
join:2008-04-11
Gloucester, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to HiVolt
Checking my earlier DMT screenshots, when I was on the earlier 5mbit profile, I still had the weird 797k upstream. Profile was also ADSL 2. It's a profile Bell chose when they put the connection on a remote. One of the TSI reps on the direct forum said that this was normal. |
|
kovy
join:2009-03-26
kudos:4 | said by sgfan:Checking my earlier DMT screenshots, when I was on the earlier 5mbit profile, I still had the weird 797k upstream. Profile was also ADSL 2. It's a profile Bell chose when they put the connection on a remote. One of the TSI reps on the direct forum said that this was normal.
Bell doesn't chose much... it's a config on the SLAM. Pretty sure if you had a ADSL modem only, it would say ADSL... it's like backward compatible. |
|
| reply to TSI Martin
I was wondering if all areas were supposed to be upgraded by now?
I'm still on the old speeds: |
|
HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:12 Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
·TekSavvy Cable
| said by Baphomet :I was wondering if all areas were supposed to be upgraded by now?
I'm still on the old speeds:
Call TSI or post in the direct forum. You'll have to register on the forum first.
You have great stats on a trusty old Alcatel dslam, so there's no issue in getting 6016/800 fast path, so you wont get screwed with these bullshit 512k upstream profiles people on IKNS remotes get stuck with.
--
GO LEAFS GO! |
|
1 edit | 
After February 2, 2012 | 
Before February 2, 2012 |
Now TSI JoelM would like me to accept the charges for Bell's fuck up on moving me to different remote. Why they did it is beyond me... logically but I would assume its more of the same Bell shenanigans |
|
kovy
join:2009-03-26
kudos:4 | lol, seems they moved you from co to remote... and now you want to go back to co... its one of those rare time I hear this. |
|
| So that's what happened! Thanks for figuring that out kovy.
Well I would like to be moved to hardware which doesn't restrict my profile to 5000/768 or 6000/512.
Personally what I have now is worse than what I was with before. So it does make sense. Clearly what Bell did made my condition worse.
I'll wait for Joel to respond before making further requests and accepting a bogus diagnostic charge. |
|
