republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
2207
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·New Overclockers ·Posting Rules ·Overclocking FAQ's ·AMD64 OC'ing Guide ·Temp Converter ·Online Stores
AuthorAll Replies

Newegg

join:2004-11-14
Norcross, GA

V-Core for 4100 at 4.71GHz?

I have my 4100 overclocked to 4.71GHz @ 1.488 on a Sabertooth. Whats everyone elses V-Core at 4.71GHz or higher? I read 1.5 @ 4.9GHz?

matt5

join:2001-10-06
Lagrangeville, NY

You will likely not see many if any people running a FX cpu as we all recommend people STAY AWAY, as they are just useless all around. Intel beats them in every regard including price/performance.

You would have better luck at »www.overclock.net


primeomega

join:2004-03-11
De Pere, WI

reply to Newegg
removed by me...



Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
kudos:2
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to matt5

said by matt5:

You will likely not see many if any people running a FX cpu as we all recommend people STAY AWAY, as they are just useless all around. Intel beats them in every regard including price/performance.

You would have better luck at »www.overclock.net

amd FX is just intels old Netburst tech with 4 cores and HT

matt5

join:2001-10-06
Lagrangeville, NY

Ya, except intel had much higher clocks than amd, making them "look" faster while amd still could eat them... amd has gone with "more cores" not "higher clock" lol but they don't even have more "cores" at least intel had a higher clock (despite lower IPC)


Tuesday, 21-May 14:05:26 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics