republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1673
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Bell Direct Forum ·Bell FAQ ·Alcatel FAQ ·Inside Wiring FAQ ·Stalls and Freezes Help ·Bell Reviews
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


Dirrty

@bell.ca

[Internet] Bell Fibe 16

Hello, everyone.
I'm about to move into my new home.
I've been having on going discussions with a bell new home rep and when I asked her if this is FTTH, she replies with:

quote:
Yes it is fibre optics, you have the direct line right to your home. The fibre terminates at your home, in order for it to be delivered to you throughout the home, it technically has to come through the copper phone lines (otherwise how else would you receive it?) There is only phone/copper and cat5 cabling throughout your home. So it must be delivered one way. This does not affect the speed or quality in any way, since the fibre actually terminates in your home.

If you are getting that info from Roger’s it is a marketing tactic used to scare people into thinking they are still getting the old dsl (digital service line) internet delivered over copper lines. This is not true.

Bell does not throttle with fibre, and is aiming to completely cut throttling when the old dsl service is obsolete completely. It is primarily the cable companies that do because they used shared cable to deliver the internet/cable so this allows people who pay for more usage to get more out of it, while limiting the use for heavy users (for gaming, downloading, etc). Here check out this link:

»www.huffingtonpost.ca/peter-nowa···862.html

I'm a total noob here. Can someone interpret this for me? I have fiber optics to my home but im limited to the copper/phone lines in my house? Is this the "funnel" effect?

They're offering a very very good deal compared to rogers at the moment. But I don't mind paying more if it means having peace of mind either....

Any help is appreciated!
TIA

jpaik

join:2002-01-09
Oakville, ON

The real experts will post with the specifics, but generally speaking this is Bell bull$hit. The fibre does not terminate in your home.
--
minimum waste, maximum joy


zorxd

join:2010-02-05
Quebec, QC
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Acanac

reply to Dirrty
Bell's marketing team do not make any distinction between fiber optics and DSL. You don't know what you are going to end up with when you order.
For them, fiber is anything that they call "fibe", even if it's really DSL most of the times. They do not know what ADSL2+ and VDSL2 means.


Dirrty

join:2012-01-26
L6C0K7

reply to Dirrty
Thanks for the replies, keep them coming!

I did some digging online and seems like this area im moving into (new development - cathedraltown) does have fiber optics in place. The bell new home rep said the same.

Is this fiber optics or either way im still restricted to the copper/phone lines as they say?


TheGrub

join:2005-11-07
Canada

reply to Dirrty
If you have FTTH (Fibre to your home) then the fiber really terminates in your house.

Nothing to do with the copper in your house after that except for the phones. You will either connect wirelessly to the Bell modem/router or with a Cat5 cable.

I have Fibe 16 + FibeTV with 4 receivers + phone and Internet is constant at 16mbps even while watching all HD on TV.


kovy

join:2009-03-26
kudos:4

1 edit

reply to Dirrty
If FTTN or FTTH, you'll get good speed... so no real worries.

Pretty sure both are throttled, but it depends on your area. My FTTN vdsl2 speed is throttled, but they did say they're going to stop.

Cable is not always throttled, just look at Videotron.

FTTH = fiber in your home with a ONT.

FTTN = Fiber to the node (brown box outside), which end with copper to your home.


zorxd

join:2010-02-05
Quebec, QC

What you call FTTN is what is called "DSL" in the rest of the world.
Aka 100% copper internet. As long as there is a DSL modem and a phone jack it isn't fiber.


kovy

join:2009-03-26
kudos:4

4 edits

said by zorxd:

What you call FTTN is what is called "DSL" in the rest of the world.
Aka 100% copper internet. As long as there is a DSL modem and a phone jack it isn't fiber.

I never said FTTN wasn't fiber and copper, or that FTTH was DSL...

FTTN is way better then copper from the CO.

FTTN has most of the network on fiber optics, and usually under 1km of copper. Which is going to be fine for Fibe16.

I could careless what type of connection gets to my home, aslong as I get what I pay for.

And your thing about DSL modem and phone jack can only be applied on DSL... The Bell fiber ONT needs the Sagemcom modem/router from Bell to work for PPPOE and I'm sure they install jacks for people who want phone service from it... if you want to get "touchy touchy" about it, we can do this all day. Saying it's 100% copper is clearly false.

InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

reply to zorxd

said by zorxd:

Aka 100% copper internet.

It is 100% copper (between the CO and you) if you live close enough to the CO to be fed without remote. After that, it becomes 40-95% fiber depending on how close you are to the remote and how far the remote is from the CO.

zorxd

join:2010-02-05
Quebec, QC
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Acanac

There is some sort of modem for FTTH but it's not a DSL modem. It's called the ONT. The Sagemcom, from what I understand, is only an ethernet router, not a modem. Also even if there is a phone jack (for the phone), your internet doesn't pass through it.

I just find it funny that in Europe and elsewhere they all have ADSL2+ and call it DSL. It's only in Canada that we try to make you believe that it's now fiber optics. It's the only place that we insist to call it FTTN. Think about it. If someone ask you do you have cable, DSL or fiber, are you going to answer "neither, I have that new thing called FTTN?"

I you lived close enough from the CO and the server 56k could be 40-95% copper too. Most of the internet is on fiber anyway, and this has always been true. On the other hand I switched from 6 Mbps ADSL to "Fibe 16" and I still have the exact same amount of copper.

Cable companies are deploying fiber too closer to homes too and they didn't rename their network to make you believe that it is now fiber optics instead of cable (even if it technically satisfies the FTTN definition). Of course what matter is the speed. That's why I don't understand what Bell don't just call it 16 Mbps DSL.


InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

said by zorxd:

It's the only place that we insist to call it FTTN. Think about it. If someone ask you do you have cable, DSL or fiber, are you going to answer "neither, I have that new thing called FTTN?"

FTTN originally stood for "Fiber To The Neighborhood" but regardless of Neighborhood vs Node, they both stand for pushing fiber closer to subscribers and applies to BOTH cable and DSL... FTTN per say is neither cable or DSL, you could even classify FTTH as FTTN in builds that use remote OLTs to feed neighborhoods.

FTTN is a first-mile network access topology, not a technology.

kovy

join:2009-03-26
kudos:4

reply to zorxd

said by zorxd:

There is some sort of modem for FTTH but it's not a DSL modem. It's called the ONT. The Sagemcom, from what I understand, is only an ethernet router, not a modem. Also even if there is a phone jack (for the phone), your internet doesn't pass through it.

I just find it funny that in Europe and elsewhere they all have ADSL2+ and call it DSL. It's only in Canada that we try to make you believe that it's now fiber optics. It's the only place that we insist to call it FTTN. Think about it. If someone ask you do you have cable, DSL or fiber, are you going to answer "neither, I have that new thing called FTTN?"

I you lived close enough from the CO and the server 56k could be 40-95% copper too. Most of the internet is on fiber anyway, and this has always been true. On the other hand I switched from 6 Mbps ADSL to "Fibe 16" and I still have the exact same amount of copper.

Cable companies are deploying fiber too closer to homes too and they didn't rename their network to make you believe that it is now fiber optics instead of cable (even if it technically satisfies the FTTN definition). Of course what matter is the speed. That's why I don't understand what Bell don't just call it 16 Mbps DSL.

For all you know, he's really getting FTTH.

Sure Bell Canada is pulling a super publicity stunt with the name Fibe... and for some reason people go nuts just thinking about it, which to me is like "WTH"... Nothing is going to change for me when they upgrade the neighbourhood with FTTH, except for speed that that would be faster... but I'd still have low caps and high bills, which is funny because it's what FTTN does for me. I can only get 25down and 7mbps up trough FTTN VDSL2, the remote is about 500m away... I have more fiber then coper.

People are making a big fuss for absolutely nothing...

zorxd

join:2010-02-05
Quebec, QC
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Acanac

There is nothing wrong with VDSL2 it's a good technology. I just don't see the need of calling this copper technology fiber.

You don't have more fiber then copper. You only have copper, because that's what's in your house. The fiber from the remote is not yours, neither is the cross-atlantic fiber that you are using to reach a server in Europe. Just like a 56k user does not have fiber just because he happens to live next door from the CO and ISP.
Finally, I got my line upgraded from 6 to 16 Mbps and I have the exact same length on copper on my line. It's not because you switch to ADSL2+ that you get a shorter copper loop. Hence I was no less on a FTTN topology then I am now.

There is still a difference between fiber and DSL. Sometimes with DSL you don't get the full speed. Some people can get 16 Mbps download but only, say, 800 kbps upload. Or maybe only 14 Mbps down, who knows? That's why some people ask if they have real fiber or plain old DSL and it is a legitimate question.


rspierz

join:2010-12-02

Kovy is completely right. Zorxd, there are slams in neighbourhoods which are fed fiber cable from the CO. From that slam to your house it is copper but that distance is generally less then 1.5 km.

Kovy explained FTTH, where the fiber actually enters your house and goes into a gateway to which then it connects to the sagecom. anything after that is your deal. Some houses even have fiber wiring to every room. I am using fibe 16 and my latency is very low (10ms) even though i have about 900meters of copper on my line. and I am able to get 25mbps/7mps service if i were to upgrade.

The only time you wont get the full speed is when your line is not 100% (factors due to noise,faulty cable, etc or the wiring in your house). I do speed tests like no tomorrow and it has been always 16 meg service at any time of the day. Real fibe or DSL should not matter when the service is 99% the same, in fact you probably wouldn't notice a difference with a full fiber connection at the same 16 meg speed.


zorxd

join:2010-02-05
Quebec, QC
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Acanac

said by rspierz:

Kovy is completely right. Zorxd, there are slams in neighbourhoods which are fed fiber cable from the CO. From that slam to your house it is copper but that distance is generally less then 1.5 km.

So what? you still get internet over the copper phone line and that technology is still called DSL in every other country, not fiber, not "fibe" and not FTTN either.
Fiber always existed and always made the largest part of the internet.

said by rspierz:

Kovy explained FTTH, where the fiber actually enters your house and goes into a gateway to which then it connects to the sagecom. anything after that is your deal. Some houses even have fiber wiring to every room. I am using fibe 16 and my latency is very low (10ms) even though i have about 900meters of copper on my line. and I am able to get 25mbps/7mps service if i were to upgrade.

Yep, FTTH is fiber and doesn't use DSL at all.

said by rspierz:

The only time you wont get the full speed is when your line is not 100% (factors due to noise,faulty cable, etc or the wiring in your house). I do speed tests like no tomorrow and it has been always 16 meg service at any time of the day. Real fibe or DSL should not matter when the service is 99% the same, in fact you probably wouldn't notice a difference with a full fiber connection at the same 16 meg speed.

There can be noise, faulty cable or wiring outside the house too.
Some people who pay for 6 Mbps DSL can only get 3.
I am about 300m from the remote and I can barely get 1 Mbps upload, which translates to 0.85 Mbps real world speed. I can't get 25/7 either, probably because my SLAM do not support VDSL2. If I had fiber I could get 25/7 and even more.

kovy

join:2009-03-26
kudos:4

reply to zorxd

said by zorxd:

There is nothing wrong with VDSL2 it's a good technology. I just don't see the need of calling this copper technology fiber.

You don't have more fiber then copper. You only have copper, because that's what's in your house. The fiber from the remote is not yours, neither is the cross-atlantic fiber that you are using to reach a server in Europe. Just like a 56k user does not have fiber just because he happens to live next door from the CO and ISP.
Finally, I got my line upgraded from 6 to 16 Mbps and I have the exact same length on copper on my line. It's not because you switch to ADSL2+ that you get a shorter copper loop. Hence I was no less on a FTTN topology then I am now.

There is still a difference between fiber and DSL. Sometimes with DSL you don't get the full speed. Some people can get 16 Mbps download but only, say, 800 kbps upload. Or maybe only 14 Mbps down, who knows? That's why some people ask if they have real fiber or plain old DSL and it is a legitimate question.

Even when it's FTTH, the Fiber is not yours... the ONT is not yours, heck even the modem/router is not yours.

We're talking about last mile here, don't put atlantic copper of whatever else in the discussion. When I say I have more fiber then copper, then I'm talking about the last mile to get to my home. I never said that I own the fiber or the copper.

Hello?!?!?! All this talk about wholesales getting acces to FTTN means nothing to you? Plenty of people are connected to CO until they change for a faster speed. Maybe you were lucky enough to be close to the CO or even already on the remote, but go on teksavvy forum and ask them how it feels to get kick out of the remote and getting 1mbps speeds.

What your talking is totally different about getting only 800kbps or only 14 down... that's set by profiles, like said, usually FTTN is under 1km of copper, so chances are the speed they order will be what the customer gets.

It may be a legitimate question, but makes just about 0 difference except for higher speed. It may also help people who have chronicle cooper problem on last mile. I'm sure FTTH will have it's own share of problems as well.

Just like FTTN, FTTH is for giving internet to more people with distance problem, eliminating copper problems, faster speed...

Look at it this way, without FTTN, I wouldn't have 25mbps down and 7mbps up... this is my distance problem.

kovy

join:2009-03-26
kudos:4

reply to zorxd

said by zorxd:

There can be noise, faulty cable or wiring outside the house too.
Some people who pay for 6 Mbps DSL can only get 3.
I am about 300m from the remote and I can barely get 1 Mbps upload, which translates to 0.85 Mbps real world speed. I can't get 25/7 either, probably because my SLAM do not support VDSL2. If I had fiber I could get 25/7 and even more.

Yes, and if you were connected to the CO, what speed could you get?

The people who pay for 6 and only get 3mbsp is because there loop lenght is too long... hence why FTTN or FTTH is required, which is what we've been discussion all along.


zorxd

join:2010-02-05
Quebec, QC
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Acanac

reply to kovy
The last mile is the part between you and the remote. It is 100% copper. Only, recently the last mile has become shorter and shorter. It has never been a mile anyway.

I was on a remote when I was on 5000/800. I was then upgraded to 6000/800 on the same copper.
Then I paid for an upgrade to Fibe 16. So I then had 19000/800. I had problems with my line (since the beginning) and they finally fixed it so I asked for my upload speed to be raised. It was raised to 1000, and I can't get more (I would need maybe 1150 to get the speed I am paying for). If I didn't do anything they would have left my profile to 19000/800. They don't care if my speed is lower.

Even under 1km, there are a lot of cases where you can't get the full speed. That's why Bell limits ADSL2+ profiles to about 19 Mbps (Fibe 16)

People have a lot of problems with DSL and many people want to get rid of it. Yes FTTH might have some other problems but at least you will always get the full speed.

Look at it this way, without FTTN, I wouldn't have 25mbps down and 7mbps up... this is my distance problem.

You mean without VDSL2. VDSL2 is the key here, not FTTN.
Even if you live next to the CO, without ADSL2+ or VDSL2 Bell would still limit you to 7Mbps/1Mbps, or 10/1 at best.

The people who pay for 6 and only get 3mbsp is because there loop lenght is too long... hence why FTTN or FTTH is required, which is what we've been discussion all along.

Those with only 3 Mbps could probably get their full 6 Mpbs over the same long copper pair if they were upgraded to ADSL2+ or RE-ADSL2. No need to deploy any more fiber in this case.
Saying that they can't get more speed is bullshit from Bell, in many cases.

I don't mean that deploying fiber wasn't required. It allows more people to get higher speeds. I just say that it's still DSL, not fiber, that is your internet connection type. And when I ask Bell if I will have fiber or DSL, I would like them to give me the good answer.

kovy

join:2009-03-26
kudos:4

4 edits

said by zorxd:

The last mile is the part between you and the remote. It is 100% copper. Only, recently the last mile has become shorter and shorter. It has never been a mile anyway.

I was on a remote when I was on 5000/800. I was then upgraded to 6000/800 on the same copper.
Then I paid for an upgrade to Fibe 16. So I then had 19000/800. I had problems with my line (since the beginning) and they finally fixed it so I asked for my upload speed to be raised. It was raised to 1000, and I can't get more (I would need maybe 1150 to get the speed I am paying for). If I didn't do anything they would have left my profile to 19000/800. They don't care if my speed is lower.

Even under 1km, there are a lot of cases where you can't get the full speed. That's why Bell limits ADSL2+ profiles to about 19 Mbps (Fibe 16)

People have a lot of problems with DSL and many people want to get rid of it. Yes FTTH might have some other problems but at least you will always get the full speed.

Look at it this way, without FTTN, I wouldn't have 25mbps down and 7mbps up... this is my distance problem.

You mean without VDSL2. VDSL2 is the key here, not FTTN.
Even if you live next to the CO, without ADSL2+ or VDSL2 Bell would still limit you to 7Mbps/1Mbps, or 10/1 at best.

The people who pay for 6 and only get 3mbsp is because there loop lenght is too long... hence why FTTN or FTTH is required, which is what we've been discussion all along.

Those with only 3 Mbps could probably get their full 6 Mpbs over the same long copper pair if they were upgraded to ADSL2+ or RE-ADSL2. No need to deploy any more fiber in this case.
Saying that they can't get more speed is bullshit from Bell, in many cases.

I don't mean that deploying fiber wasn't required. It allows more people to get higher speeds. I just say that it's still DSL, not fiber, that is your internet connection type. And when I ask Bell if I will have fiber or DSL, I would like them to give me the good answer.

First of all, Remote is not a CO and last mile doesn't start at the remote. You think the throttling DPI machine are at the remotes?

Why are you talking about your speed problem? It's obviously related to the SLAM limitation technologie used by Bell.

Your going to have to show me these "a lot a cases where they can't get full speed under 1km"... cause this is a bold claim and I want some evidence. The only reason why Bell limites it's ADSL2+ to fibe 16, is because they chose too (there's also a interleaved profil to 22Mbps but they never use it), and they don't use the ADSL2+ annex M for the upload.

Yes, without VDSL2 I couldn't get 25/7mbps, but without FTTN I couldn't get it either since I'm 2.3km from the CO. WIthout FTTN I wouldn't get 16mbps either, probably get max 10mbps. So for me, thank god for FTTN... hence why I said this is my distance problem. And this is even more important for people at 5 or 6km from CO.

I have plenty of neighbours living next to me paying for 5-6mbps and they're connected to the CO, if they wanted to upgrade to 25/7mbps they need to be transferred to the remote (JWI).

How could people get 6mbps if the upgrade the SLAM to ADSL2+????

»surispace.files.wordpress.com/20···umb1.jpg

They all have the same length conditions and this is when it's a perfect world!

And again, I don't care if my internet comes from a string of cotton, I just want to get what I pay for.

zorxd

join:2010-02-05
Quebec, QC
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Acanac

1 edit

last mile is the last part of the connection. It runs from the DSLAM to the modem and is 100% copper. The throttling doesn't have to be done on the last mile.
Then there is fiber from the DSLAM to my ISP. But this is no longer part of the last mile.

And again, I don't care if my internet comes from a string of cotton, I just want to get what I pay for.

Agreed, but that's not a reason to lie about the used technology. There is no shame to tell that you sell a 25/7 DSL internet.

Some people might be arround 2.5-3 km and have a noisy line. In this case their profile can be lowered to 3Mbps to insure stability. With ADSL2+ they could get higher speed with the same stability.

As I told you, I am 300m from the remote and the max upload speed I can get is 1000 kbps. So I don't get full speed (which would be 1.4 Mbps). The technician also said that the max download capacity of my line is about 22 Mbps, but to be safe I would need to be limited at around 20 Mbps. Not everyone gets the full 24 Mbps as you can see.

DSL just seems very buggy at least on Bell's network. Half of my friends with DSL moved to cable for stability alone. I went the hard way and received a dozen technician visit or so over the last 2 years, but I think my line is finally good (only 5 disconnections since the last 24h)

Yes, without VDSL2 I couldn't get 25/7mbps, but without FTTN I couldn't get it either since I'm 2.3km from the CO. WIthout FTTN I wouldn't get 16mbps either, probably get max 10mbps. So for me, thank god for FTTN... hence why I said this is my distance problem. And this is even more important for people at 5 or 6km from CO.

Bell could have more CO and no remotes. Then you wouldn't call it FTTN and it would have the same effect.
On cable people don't know and don't care about their distance to the fiber. They don't call it FTTN, and even less fiber.

Sunday, 03-Jun 21:56:04 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics