 spewakR.I.P DadkinsPremium
join:2001-08-07
Elk Grove, CA
kudos:1
 ·SureWest Internet
 ·Clear Wireless
| "Guess metered Billing wasn't necessary after all...." 44% profit is nothing to sneeze at, yet the question remains: Why not try for 88% profit by soaking on overages and per byte billing? This is the way the corporate greedy bastards everywhere think. 
--
The weekend is here, grab a can of beer!
|
|
| said by spewak:44% profit is nothing to sneeze at, yet the question remains: Why not try for 88% profit by soaking on overages and per byte billing? This is the way the corporate greedy bastards everywhere think.
If you're a CEO of my company and your goal is not the highest profit possible, you're fired. |
|
| Absolutely! |
|
| reply to spewak
You can try for 88% profit, but if you go for that too quickly, the damage to your customer base may bee too severe and you may end up losing money the next time around. |
|
| said by jjeffeory:You can try for 88% profit, but if you go for that too quickly, the damage to your customer base may bee too severe and you may end up losing money the next time around.
That's true. But you don't have to please everybody.
Even AAPL pisses off a lot of people, yet they are raking in record profits and they are now the most valuable company on Earth. |
|
spewakR.I.P DadkinsPremium
join:2001-08-07
Elk Grove, CA
kudos:1 Reviews:
·SureWest Internet
·Clear Wireless
| reply to jjeffeory
Re: "Guess metered Billing wasn't necessary after all....&q said by jjeffeory:You can try for 88% profit, but if you go for that too quickly, the damage to your customer base may bee too severe and you may end up losing money the next time around.
To quote a wiseman: "Absolutely"
--
The weekend is here, grab a can of beer!
|
|
