republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

AndyDufresne
Premium
join:2010-10-30

reply to 45612019

Re: That's true.

Let some TW customer try to download 16 TB on a residential account and see what happens to them.

NWOhio

join:2011-10-25
Toledo, OH

very true. especially with that nice little clause in their TOS/AUP that everyone agrees to that does NOT read and that BBR readers/Karl followers refuse to read/pay attention to.


Wilsdom

join:2009-08-06

reply to AndyDufresne
Takes me as long as year to do that, but that is still 5x the capability or 1/5 the price of Comcast's fancy "faster" DOCSIS 3



fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

reply to AndyDufresne

said by AndyDufresne:

Let some TW customer try to download 16 TB on a residential account and see what happens to them.

And THAT is pretty much the definition of abuse.

bn1221

join:2009-04-29
Cortland, NY

reply to AndyDufresne
I've done 8TB on a business cable line. I know that's not the point but at $97.50 for 2*15 - burst to 20 that's still pretty good?



winsyrstrife
River City Bounce
Premium
join:2002-04-30
Brooklyn, NY

reply to AndyDufresne
Within what time frame?



45612019

join:2004-02-05
New York, NY

reply to AndyDufresne
I've done 6 TB on Time Warner residential before so I bet I could get away with 16 TB. That's already more data than a Comcap customer is allowed to transfer in 2 years.

They really do not give a shit. Bandwidth costs these companies nothing and now that DOCSIS 3.0 has been rolled out congestion is no longer a concern either. Bandwidth capping is straight up for controlling Internet video competition only; there are no other financial reasons behind it.


Sunday, 03-Jun 21:58:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics