site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
608
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000

AT&T is clueless

An AT&T Senior VP told me and a few others that they do not see a threat from Cable. When on of us asked why he said that Cable can't do a quad play. That's their mind set. They honestly think that as long as Cable can't offer wireless they are no threat.

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

This is why companies like AT&T sit on and squat spectrum though. if Comcast where able to buy spectrum they would not need deals with Verizon, they could build out their own cellular network. And in areas they service with Cable just use their own fiber backbone as the back feed for the tower.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports



KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

reply to battleop
I guess Muni-Fiber is no threat, then.... but why do they oppose it every time it's suggested?



Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

reply to battleop

When on of us asked why he said that Cable can't do a quad play. That's their mind set. They honestly think that as long as Cable can't offer wireless they are no threat.

What do they think of the new quad-play cable industry partnership with Verizon Wireless?


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000

Maybe I'll get another chance to ask in June.


FLATLINE

join:2007-02-27
Buffalo, NY

reply to KrK
It is a threat to them. Dont let them confuse you. They see everything as a threat. Even you!



djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T U-Verse
·VOIPo
·PHONE POWER

reply to battleop
At one point I had all four services from AT&T. I didn't bother to integrate my wireless bill, there was no advantage in doing so. Now all I have left is my AT&T wireless account.

AT&T's dumbest move was to add 150gb caps to these un-upgraded markets. If I was a heavy user I might put up with slower speeds if I could use it unlimited.
--
AT&T U-Hearse - RIP Unlimited Internet 1995-2011
Rethink Billable.


ConstantineM

join:2011-09-02
San Jose, CA
Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Junction Networks
·Callcentric
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to battleop
Wow indeed!

Who cares about quad-play? Nowadays, it's cheaper to get all the services unbundled anyways. Noone uses quad play, it's stupid and there are not even any incentives at all whatsoever.

I've been with U-verse for 1.5 years, never received anything about AT&T Wireless that wasn't already available to regular non-U-verse customers in the first place.



cousintim

join:2004-10-10
Dallas, TX

said by ConstantineM:

Wow indeed!

Who cares about quad-play? Nowadays, it's cheaper to get all the services unbundled anyways. Noone uses quad play, it's stupid and there are not even any incentives at all whatsoever.

Sometimes bundling makes sense. I pay $55 for 10/1 and unlimited phone.

en103

join:2011-05-02

reply to djrobx
yup... TWC speeds here in Santa Clarita area pretty good.
Looks like they finally fixed wireless on Seco Canyon for you.


pandora
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:1

reply to Kearnstd
Comcast could buy Sprint. Comcast has decent management, a lot of cash, and a track record of updating technology.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."


Monday, 04-Jun 13:44:26 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics