elray
join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA | Pure Speculation Karl continues to beat the drum that DSL customers are bailing to Cable "in un-upgraded markets", without ever offering any data to back up his charge. |
|
| Just look at net adds for cable and net adds for telcos. Cable is coming out ahead regarding broadband internet connections. Now that cable has deal with Verizon and is only going to get worse for ATT. |
|
elray
join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA Reviews:
 ·SONIC.NET
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| said by AndyDufresne:Just look at net adds for cable and net adds for telcos. Cable is coming out ahead regarding broadband internet connections. Now that cable has deal with Verizon and is only going to get worse for ATT.
But there is no data indicating that even ANY of the "losses" are occuring in "un-upgraded" areas.
There are a half-dozen different ways to interpret the tea leaves. How does Karl know, that he can make such a claim? |
|
| Verizon has NET ADDS of interet connections, showing a large increase in FiOS subscribers, and major losses in DSL. How else can you interpret that? Youre not making any sense whatsoever. |
|
elray
join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by ITALIAN926:Verizon has NET ADDS of interet connections, showing a large increase in FiOS subscribers, and major losses in DSL. How else can you interpret that? Youre not making any sense whatsoever.
Did Verizon lose all of its DSL customers to Cable, or are all of their Fios adds brand new customers? How many DSL customers "cut the cord" entirely?
Net adds of Fios customers doesn't delineate where they came from. Net losses of DSL customers doesn't indicate where they went.
You're simply assuming a relationship that may not exist. |
|
