| i38HG increasing latency by 5-8ms? As the topic says.
I am finding it hard to believe that this is actually increasing ping times... but it appears so.
Has anyone else observed this?
Using the Ethernet port on the iNID has dropped pings by that much.
Just find it a little odd. I am guessing line issues between it and the iNID. |
|
| I'm confused, are you speaking of the difference between HPNA setup vs ethernet? If you are talking about the INiD having higher ping times due to bonded lines I find that a little hard to swallow. I haven't seen anything of the contrary in all the installs I've done. |
|
| The iNID does add at least 20ms for me over DSL or cable.
That appears to be the nature of that beast.
My issue is that using the i38HG adds 5-8ms between me and the iNID.
I may toss a piece of cat5 out the window and try it again just to see if that is it.
Yes... it's strange.... don't ask me why this appears to be the case. |
|
| reply to TestBoy
Maybe a little OT, but I am curious, what is your first hop ping when directly connected to the iNID via Ethernet? |
|
| said by WhyMe420:Maybe a little OT, but I am curious, what is your first hop ping when directly connected to the iNID via Ethernet?
It's 23-25ms when using the Ethernet port.
If I plug into the i38HG it's 30-35 which is the odd part. |
|
| AT&T U-verse VDSL is interleaved which means your pings are going to be a little higher then on cable. Nothing you or I could do about that. Using HPNA will add very little to none added latency. |
|
| reply to TestBoy
Curious to see your HPNA stats using the U-verse realtime tool. |
|
| said by PremTech101 :Curious to see your HPNA stats using the U-verse realtime tool.
Here are the images.
»imageshack.us/g/205/coaxhpna2012···025.png/
It looks like everything is peachy to me. |
|
| Need a tracert image listing the hop times to see your delay time. 
Chris |
|
